Whoa.
This is big. Attorney General and former Governor of California Jerry Brown says prop 8 is invalid. Yesterday Brown filed a legal brief claiming the same-sex marriage ban, which would amend the California Constitution to include discrimination and gays and lesbian couples, "is itself unconstitutional because it deprives a minority group of a fundamental right."
Why is this so dramatic? Basically, Jerry Brown's job is to defend the state's laws. But he was in a tricky position because prop 8 might violate the constitution. So, which one should he defend? The equal protection clause or prop 8? It seems like an easy decision to us -- you have to defend equal protection; it would be nuts if the state suddenly turned against its decades of support for nondiscrimination laws.
Then again, it's a messy, complex issue that is beyond radioactive, politically speaking. The people who want to limit equal protection will argue that this isn't fair; that Brown is ignoring the will of the voters in the last election, and that they deserve to have prop 8 defended. However, there are loads of other lawyers ready to defend prop 8. And Jerry is defending the will of the voters -- fifty years' worth of will that is plainly evident in California's pioneering protection of civil equality.
Brown, we should point out, is also thinking about making a run for the governor chair. Again.
That said, we haven't been this proud of the state of California since the election. Way to go, Golden State.
Image: official portrait of Jerry Brown as Governor of California, from the California State Capitol Museum. Painted by Don Bachardy.
of course

Join the conversation
Comments
Comments load automatically as this section approaches.