In-N-Out recently imposed a mask ban for workers on the job — but California law for COVID-19 workplace rules mean that In-N-Out workers in the state still have the right to decide for themselves whether to wear face coverings until at least February 2025.

The burger chain said in a memo earlier this month that it wants to "emphasize the importance of customer service” and “the ability to show our Associates' smiles and other facial features,” as KTVU reported.

In-N-Out’s memo reportedly lays out different rules for different states, though. The ban masks has been limited to restaurants in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and Utah, where it has a total of 116 locations. (Although employees are allowed to wear masks if they present a medical note that "clearly states the reason for the exemption.")

But in California and Oregon, the choice to mask will have to be left up to each individual worker. California in particular has 70% of all of its operating restaurants.

This isn’t the first time In-N-Out has faced controversy about its workplace regulations around the COVID pandemic. It refused to enforce California’s local indoor vaccine mandates in the fall of 2021, and when locations in SF and the East Bay refused to check customers' vaccination records, they were temporarily shut down.

But in 2023, California’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health in charge of workplace safety updated its COVID-19 requirements which include how, "Employers must allow employees to wear face coverings if they voluntarily choose to do so, unless it would create a safety hazard."

They’re in effect until February 3, 2025, and could still be extended.

RELATED: In-N-Out Has Launched a Burger Truck Serving Mini Double-Doubles

Image via Unsplash/Qi Li.

Bad news cancer fighters, arthritic sufferers, and those of you who worked so hard at getting your medical marijuana ID card under false pretenses: employees who partake in the kind medical bud at home can be fired for testing positive for the drug at work. Which? Wow.

In a 5 to 2 decision today, the court claims that Proposition 215, "the 1996 state initiative that allowed Californians to use marijuana for medical purposes with a doctor's recommendation," no longer protects workers from getting fired for violating federal drug laws before, during, or after work hours.

What's more, an employer who knowingly hire a medical marijuana user is "'arguably being complicit in an activity that's illegal under federal law.'" This chink in the cannabis armor comes on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court's continuing approval of the federal government's strong-arming local medical mary jane offices and suppliers for "violating federal laws that ban the possession, cultivation and distribution of marijuana and recognize no legitimate use for the drug." (An aside: Aleve does wonders for pain, folks, especially when mixed with two Benadryl. Just saying.)