<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[arriage - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:48:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/arriage/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case on Gay Marriage]]></title><description><![CDATA[A decision has been made. The California Supreme Court <a href="http://cbs5.com/local/proposition.8.lawsuit.2.868602.html">has decided to hear the legal issues over Prop. 8</a>, the same-sex marriage ...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2008/11/19/california_supreme_court_agrees_to/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242a2744ad066cdcf5d255</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[arriage]]></category><category><![CDATA[california state supreme court]]></category><category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case on Gay Marriage]]></category><category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category><category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category><category><![CDATA[proposition 8]]></category><category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:09:30 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2008/12/entry193836_thumb-thumb-640xauto-40058.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2008/12/entry193836_thumb-thumb-640xauto-40058.jpg" alt="California Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case on Gay Marriage"><p>A decision has been made. The California Supreme Court <a href="http://cbs5.com/local/proposition.8.lawsuit.2.868602.html">has decided to hear the legal issues over Prop. 8</a>, the same-sex marriage ban which passed by razor-thin 52% of the vote, <strong>but said it won't issue a stay against the voter-approved same-sex marriage ban</strong>. Which is to say, county clerks will not be allowed to resume issuing licenses to queer couples until the case is decided. <a href="http://sfist.com/2008/11/17/prop_8_demonstrarion_aftermarch_111.php">Prop. 8</a> is still in effect.</p>

<p>Court spokeswoman Lynn Holton, according to the <em><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/1095/story/1412194.html">The Sacramento Bee</a></em>, said the court asked the parties who filed the suits to write briefs on three issues:</p>

<blockquote>(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution?

<p>(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation-of-powers doctrine under the California Constitution?</p>

<p>(3) If <a href="http://sfist.com/2008/11/07/prop_8_protest_117_san_francisco.php">Proposition 8</a> is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>(Feel free to write your own brief briefs as well in the comments, readers.)</p>

<p>An "oral argument" could happen as early as March 2009. To read the court's decision, go <a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/documents/S168047_S168066_S168078-11-19-08_ORDER.pdf">here</a>. (Warning: .pdf file.)</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>