Even though Gavin vetoed that alcohol "fee" (or "tax" if you prefer), there are apparently rumblings still on the Board of Supervisors, likely originating with John Avalos, about trying to override Gavin's veto. We thought they needed eight votes to veto the veto, but according to the Examiner, confusingly, "The legislation passed 6-3, but would need a two-thirds vote to override the mayor’s veto." So it only needs six votes in a new vote? That makes no sense. Anyhow, we're pretty sure this thing is still dead in the water, and any threats Avalos makes about putting this on a ballot for the voters seem pretty empty and ill-advised. [Examiner]