<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[wiretapping - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:29:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/wiretapping/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Google Will Face Federal Lawsuit For Reading People's Gmail]]></title><description><![CDATA[Between the NSA, Facebook, and Google, your life is an open book.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2013/09/27/google_will_face_federal_lawsuit_fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24344944ad066cdcfafff2</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category><category><![CDATA[Google]]></category><category><![CDATA[privacy concerns]]></category><category><![CDATA[wiretapping]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Barmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:50:17 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2013/09/gmail-logo-thumb-640xauto-810405.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2013/09/gmail-logo-thumb-640xauto-810405.jpg" alt="Google Will Face Federal Lawsuit For Reading People's Gmail"><p>Between the NSA, Facebook, and Google, your life is an open book. But, a federal judge in San Jose <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/09/gmail-wiretap-ruling/">ruled Thursday</a> that Google will have to face a wiretapping lawsuit over the claim that it illegally scans Gmail users' email for keywords that are used to deliver ads. Google doesn't refute the claim but says that users waived their right to email privacy when they clicked Agree on the user agreement for the software.</p>

<p>U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh writes, "The court finds that it cannot conclude that any party -- Gmail users or non-Gmail users -- has consented to Google’s reading of e-mail for the purposes of creating user profiles or providing targeted advertising." At issue seems to be whether the privacy polices Google had users consent to were sufficient in granting consent for the specific purpose of intercepting email for improving their own business model. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2013/09/GoogleGmailOrder092613.pdf">Read the whole ruling here</a>, which relates to a proposed class action in the Gmail case.</p>

<p>This is the second wiretapping case Google is contending with, the first being <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/09/google-wi-fi-do-over/">this earlier case</a> in which they could be potentially liable for intercepting open wi-fi signals and inadvertently collecting user data while trolling the streets with their Street View mapping cars.</p>

<p>[<a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/09/gmail-wiretap-ruling/">Wired</a>]<br>
[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-26/google-must-face-most-claims-in-gmail-wiretap-lawsuit.html">Bloomberg</a>]</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[SF Judge to Hold Hearing on Federal Illegal Wiretap Case]]></title><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughn_R._Walker">U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker</a> will hold a hearing on September 1 regarding the <a href="http://cbs5.com/local/warrantless.wiretap....]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/07/10/sf_judge_to_hold_hearing_on_federal/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2423af44ad066cdcf275fe</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category><category><![CDATA[court system]]></category><category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category><category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category><category><![CDATA[wiretapping]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leanne Maxwell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:30:08 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/07/wiretap-thumb-640xauto-384681.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/07/wiretap-thumb-640xauto-384681.jpg" alt="SF Judge to Hold Hearing on Federal Illegal Wiretap Case"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughn_R._Walker">U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker</a> will hold a hearing on September 1 regarding the <a href="http://cbs5.com/local/warrantless.wiretap.spying.2.1079880.html">federal government's illegal wiretapping</a> of former charity, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Haramain_Foundation">Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation</a> of Ashland, Oregon, in 2004. The charity has presented public documents that show that agents <a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/01/06/the-al-haramain-dates/">eavesdropped on phone calls without a warrant</a>, which violated the federal <a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/">Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act</a>, known as FISA. </p>

<p>The Obama Administration had <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/28/al_haramain/">unsuccessfully tried to block</a> this case from proceeding, parroting Bush's claim that it would "endanger national security secrets" and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/02/world/americas/02iht-obama.1.14161755.html">contradicting</a> yet another one of Obama's <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9845595-7.html">campaign promises</a>. </p>

<p>Judge Walker also presided over several other wiretap lawsuits that were mostly against the major telecommunications companies, but he <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/04/us/politics/04nsa.html">dismissed them last month</a> because a 2008 FISA amendment shielded the companies from being sued for alleged surveillance aid to the government. The plaintiffs are appealing the ruling. (This is why SFist is a loyal customer of <a href="http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/no_fisa_capitulation/">progressive cell phone</a> company <a href="http://www.credomobile.com/mission/Default.aspx">Working Assets/Credo</a>.)</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>