<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[rumor - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:09:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/rumor/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Hands Wrung, Pearls Clutched Over Rumor That Next iPhone Won't Have A Headphone Jack]]></title><description><![CDATA[Rumor has it that the upcoming iPhone 7 won't have a headphone jack.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2015/12/02/phoney_drama/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242f3844ad066cdcf86edf</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[apple]]></category><category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category><category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category><category><![CDATA[iphone 7]]></category><category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eve Batey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:15:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2015/12/headphones-thumb-640xauto-923836.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2015/12/headphones-thumb-640xauto-923836.jpg" alt="Hands Wrung, Pearls Clutched Over Rumor That Next iPhone Won't Have A Headphone Jack"><p></p>

<p>Rumors that the next iPhone might have fewer holes have come and gone for months now, but a report on a frequently-reliable Japanese blog has the Western world buzzing that the upcoming iPhone 7 will come without a headphone jack.</p>

<p>No one knows when the iPhone 7 is going to appear, or even if that's what it's going to be called — hell, they could call it the "iPhone Pro" or the "Apple Phone" or the "Ha Ha Finally Made You Buy A Newton," for all we know. But that hasn't stopped <a href="http://www.macotakara.jp/blog/rumor/entry-28639.html">Japanese-language blog Macotakara</a> from learning from a "reliable source" that the "headphones included with the thinner model will use a Lightning connector to transfer audio data," <a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/399993/apple-would-be-stupid-to-drop-the-iphone-headphone-jack/">Cult of Mac reports</a>, and that Apple will dump the standard 3.5mm headphone jack that you see on pretty much every audio device anywhere else.</p>

<p>Of course, Apple hasn't commented on the speculation, <a href="https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;ion=1&amp;espv=2&amp;ie=UTF-8#q=Macotakara+headphone+jack">which has been picked up by tech writers across the globe</a>. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/12/01/iphone-7-headphone-jack-rumor-report/76591864/">According to USA Today</a>, Macotakara has some credibility as an iPhone rumor source, having correctly predicted developments like changes in size for the device.</p>

<p>While more and more users are opting out of wired headphones for Bluetooth ones (I know once I went Bluetooth, I couldn't imagine ever going back to the tangled mess of traditional earbuds), <a href="http://mashable.com/2015/11/30/apple-iphone-7-no-headphone-jack/#I0ctTV7RuPqB">Mashable says that</a> "dropping [the standard] port could cause a world of hurt for hundreds of millions of headset owners." </p>

<p>The jack ditch is reportedly spurred by a desire to make the phone thinner. But as <a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/399993/apple-would-be-stupid-to-drop-the-iphone-headphone-jack/">Cult of Mac notes</a>, "Apple can sit back and talk up how a thinner iPhone and slightly better audio quality is worth sacrificing one of the few global standards remaining. But none of that will matter when people want to listen to music while charging their phone and can’t without busting out some Bluetooth headphones."</p>

<p>Of course, this isn't the first time Apple's dropped seemingly imperative feature from one of their devices and managed to stagger on — as you might recall if you are old like me, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/149878/apple_imac.html">Apple's original 1998 iMac shipped without a floppy drive</a>, which many critics at the time said made it completely useless. As it turns out, a floppy drive was a lot less crucial than people thought, wasn't it! The same appears to be true for DVD drives, <a href="http://www.cnet.com/news/apples-plan-to-wipe-out-disc-drives-is-nearly-complete/">which Apple started dumping years ago</a>, and yet we continue to survive.</p>

<p>For Cult of Mac, however, the spurning of the standard headphone jack is less bold innovation and more "stupid." "We expect that if this rumor proves to be true, Apple will end up alienating customers and manufacturers alike, and it won’t be a transitory thing like the charging cable change-up," they write.</p>

<p>"Dropping the iPhone headphone jack would represent a serious drop in functionality in favor of claiming even more control over what people can and can’t plug into their phones."</p>

<p><strong>Update:</strong> <a href="http://sfist.com/2015/12/02/phoney_drama.php#comment-2389430182">SFist commenter Akit raises a great point</a>!  How would killing the headphone jack impact payment processing services like Square, which use the headphone jack to attach their card readers? I don't have the answer to that one, either — I assume the readers would need an adapter, too. Like Akit said, it will be interesting to see how those companies react to the change, should it occur.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Patrick Swayze is NOT Dead]]></title><description><![CDATA[Although reports were swirling -- <em>swirling!</em> - <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%22Patrick%20Swayze%22%20OR%20Swayze">all over Twitter this morning</a>, "Hungry Eyes" crooner and <em>Poin...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/05/19/patrick_swayze_is_not_dead/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24304e44ad066cdcf8f740</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[patrick swayze]]></category><category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category><category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:45:21 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/05/patrick swayze dead-thumb-640xauto-236832.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/05/patrick swayze dead-thumb-640xauto-236832.jpg" alt="Patrick Swayze is NOT Dead"><p></p>

<p>Although reports were swirling -- <em>swirling!</em> - <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%22Patrick%20Swayze%22%20OR%20Swayze">all over Twitter this morning</a>, "Hungry Eyes" crooner and <em>Point Break</em> star Patrick Swayze<a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5261286/todays-twitter-hysteria-says-patrick-swayze-has-died-he-didnt">is not dead</a>. He is alive. He has some serious cancer issues, yes; but he's alive. This false rumor comes on the heels of last week's <a href="http://sfist.com/2009/05/15/prop_8_not_overturned_folks.php">Prop 8-overturned</a> rumor gone wrong and the <a href="http://gawker.com/5213568/twitter-meets-mass-hysteria">gay book-ban-on-Amazon</a> falsity. </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[American Football Spectacular: The Niners Are Courting Condi?! Keep Your Powder Dry.]]></title><description><![CDATA[OK, it has been <a href=http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/10/26/49ers-interested-in-condoleezza-rice/>reported by the NFL Network</a> that the 49ers may offer a position to Secretary Of State <a href=http://e...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2008/10/27/american_football_spectacular_the_n/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242ae044ad066cdcf62d3d</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[49ers]]></category><category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category><category><![CDATA[afs]]></category><category><![CDATA[American Football Spectacular]]></category><category><![CDATA[condi]]></category><category><![CDATA[Condoleezza Rice]]></category><category><![CDATA[fail]]></category><category><![CDATA[failure]]></category><category><![CDATA[flash 80]]></category><category><![CDATA[football]]></category><category><![CDATA[i miss eddie debartolo]]></category><category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category><category><![CDATA[Jerry Rice]]></category><category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category><category><![CDATA[Niners]]></category><category><![CDATA[no]]></category><category><![CDATA[pathetic]]></category><category><![CDATA[please baby jesus let it be a rumor]]></category><category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category><category><![CDATA[war]]></category><category><![CDATA[what's next -- Kissinger at defensive coordinator?]]></category><category><![CDATA[yorks]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[SFist Christopher Rogers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:32:23 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2008/12/entry189528_thumb-thumb-640xauto-37054.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2008/12/entry189528_thumb-thumb-640xauto-37054.jpg" alt="American Football Spectacular: The Niners Are Courting Condi?! Keep Your Powder Dry."><p>Meaning: Be prepared and save your resources until they are needed.</p>

<p>Origin: The allusion is to gunpowder which soldiers had to keep dry in order to be ready to fight when required.</p>

<p>OK, it has been <a href="http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/10/26/49ers-interested-in-condoleezza-rice/">reported by the NFL Network</a> that the 49ers may offer a position to Secretary Of State <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice"><b>Condoleezza Rice</b></a></p>

<blockquote>One high-ranking 49ers official said last week, “If she’s interested in talking to us, I’m interested in talking to her.” Rice has told friends as recently as last week she would love to become president of an NFL team.</blockquote>

<p>Should this rumor develop into an actual possibility, you'd best be that we'll unleash a fusillade of withering criticism at the current all-measurable-results-are-failure <b>York</b> family 49er ownership for offering a job to an all-measurable-results-are-failure war criminal. For the Yorks to make such an insane business move... the thought almost defeats all irony. This simply can't be.</p>

<p>Or, perhaps it'd be a perfect match: at best, Ms. Rice is inept, allowing herself to be blinded by her own preconceptions, and in following her preconceptions, she has horribly injured the United States Of America. At worst, she's a liar, who ineptly attempted to craft reality to her own preconceptions and failed, horribly injuring the United States Of America.</p>

<p>Either way -- her record of stubbornness in the face of facts, obfuscation, avoidance of consensus, lack of care for the people she was tasked to represent, and overall results of abject failure make her a perfect candidate for these York-owned 49ers based on all of the post-<b>Mooch</b> decisions that <b>Dr. York</b> has made.</p>

<p>Pa<i>thet</i>ic.</p>

<p>Not to mention the fact that <a href="http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/10/26/49ers-interested-in-condoleezza-rice/">she's <i>a Broncos fan</i></a>!</p>

<p>Let this only be a rumor. Please.</p>

<p>The 49ers should be retiring <b>Jerry Rice</b>'s jersey, not offering the specific personage of failure that is Condoleezza Rice any sort of of job in any capacity ever. <i>Ever</i>.</p>

<p><font size="1"><i>Photo via ytmnd.com</i></font></p><i>lieve</i>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>