<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[rate - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:25:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/rate/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Map: Northern California Unemployment]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFGate's 'Scavenger' came up with the above handy Google map, denoting the<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/scavenger/detail?entry_id=41660&tsp=1"> 20 northern California cities with the hi...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/06/12/map_northern_california_unemploymen/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24263144ad066cdcf3c7cd</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[Google Map]]></category><category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category><category><![CDATA[map]]></category><category><![CDATA[rate]]></category><category><![CDATA[redcession]]></category><category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:05:27 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/06/unemployment is bad real bad-thumb-640xauto-302801.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<center>
<iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=106522379340322591577.00046c2b40b471b0edcab&amp;source=embed&amp;ll=38.099983,-121.838379&amp;spn=8.209565,8.349609&amp;output=embed"></iframe><br><small>View <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=106522379340322591577.00046c2b40b471b0edcab&amp;source=embed&amp;ll=38.099983,-121.838379&amp;spn=8.209565,8.349609" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">Northern CA Unemployment</a> in a larger map</small>
</center>

<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/06/unemployment is bad real bad-thumb-640xauto-302801.jpg" alt="Map: Northern California Unemployment"><p>SFGate's 'Scavenger' came up with the above handy Google map, denoting the<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/scavenger/detail?entry_id=41660&amp;tsp=1"> 20 northern California cities with the highest unemployment rates</a>. While it's not a joyous thing to behold, it is interesting to see where we're at right now in the state. The top spots went to #5: <a href="http://www.cityofmadera.org">Madera</a> (18.5% unemployment), #4: <a href="http://www.ci.salinas.ca.us">Salinas</a> (18.7%), #3: <a href="http://www.yubacity.net">Yuba City</a> (19.2%), #2: <a href="http://www.ceres.ca.gov">Ceres</a> (19.2%), and #1: <a href="http://www.ci.watsonville.ca.us/">Watsonville</a> (24%). </p>

<p>Some Bay Area cities that made the list include Oakland (13.9%), East Palo Alto (16.8%), and San Pablo (17.6%), coming in at #18, #10 and #8, respectively. </p>

<p>Not so <a href="http://sfist.com/2009/06/03/sf_weekly_catches_on_to_funemployme.php">fun</a> now, is it?</p>

<p>The Sacramento Bee has<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/1098/story/1926578.html"> more info</a> on all 20 cities.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[100]]></title><description><![CDATA[Alas.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2007/12/17/100/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242a2444ad066cdcf5d024</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[100]]></category><category><![CDATA[City]]></category><category><![CDATA[City Hall]]></category><category><![CDATA[crime]]></category><category><![CDATA[District]]></category><category><![CDATA[Early Saturday]]></category><category><![CDATA[love]]></category><category><![CDATA[murder]]></category><category><![CDATA[police]]></category><category><![CDATA[rate]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category><category><![CDATA[South Van Ness]]></category><category><![CDATA[the city]]></category><category><![CDATA[the police]]></category><category><![CDATA[Van Ness]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:35:35 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry138212_thumb-thumb-640xauto-174217.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry138212_thumb-thumb-640xauto-174217.jpg" alt="100"><p>Alas.</p>

<p>We hit the <a href="http://sfcrime.blogspot.com/2007/12/mission-district-shooting-leaves-two.html">100th murder mark</a> over the weekend. And this big 1-0-0, as you know, is not a cause for celebration. Early Saturday morning at around 5 a.m., Jose Alberto Chel Camara, 21, and Jaiber Nah Carballo, 20 were shot and killed on 18th Street and South Van Ness. (The assailants were "<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/12/16/BACHTVEJQ.DTL">described as two men in their 20s, but it was unclear whether one or both were the shooters</a>" and no arrests have been made, yada, yada, same horrible story, different day.) These two homicides forced SF to break the unenviable 100-murder barrier this year. Hopefully, <a href="http://www.sfgov.org/site/mayor_index.asp">someone</a> will take on the equally unenviable task of helping the city see a reduction in the growing murder rate. Starting... now. Ideally.</p>

<p>In 2006 SF saw a total of <strong>85</strong> homicides, <strong>96</strong> in 2005, and <strong>88</strong> in 2004 -- a <em>fairly</em> steady and frightening increase. </p>

<p>And seeing as how the police department and City Hall always enjoy asking for help from the public when it comes to crime, any suggestions on how to curb SF's climbing rate? We're sure they'd love to hear from you.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>