<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[rant - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:56:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/rant/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Whiny William Shatner's Rants About 'Nobodies' Getting Verified On Twitter]]></title><description><![CDATA[This weekend, <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner">Verified Twitter user</a> William Shatner <a href="http://time.com/2911882/william-shatner-doesnt-think-you-should-be-verified-on-twitter/">w...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2014/06/23/william_shatners_rants_about_nobodi/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2427a444ad066cdcf48786</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[rant]]></category><category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category><category><![CDATA[verified]]></category><category><![CDATA[William Shatner]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jen Carlson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:50:26 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2014/06/twittershatner-thumb-640xauto-848218.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2014/06/twittershatner-thumb-640xauto-848218.jpeg" alt="Whiny William Shatner's Rants About 'Nobodies' Getting Verified On Twitter"><p></p>

<p>This weekend, <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner">Verified Twitter user</a> William Shatner <a href="http://time.com/2911882/william-shatner-doesnt-think-you-should-be-verified-on-twitter/">went on a rant</a> on Twitter, about Twitter. His issue: People he has deemed "nobodies" getting verified on the social media platform—the coveted blue checkmark, he believes, should only be for famouses like himself. Kind of like <a href="http://www.debate.org/opinions/did-william-shatner-kill-his-wife">how murder charges</a> work...</p>

<p>His main target that spurred this whole thing is Engadget’s social media manager John Colucci, who is Verified but not Famous—you see, sometimes even if you aren't in a movie you get this distinction, most often this happens when you work for a media outlet.</p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/johncolucci">@johncolucci</a> Why are you even <a href="https://twitter.com/verified">@verified</a>? If this guy can get verified I'll nominate my Social Media guy.</p>— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/statuses/480472841037426688">June 21, 2014</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/DashaPohoral">@DashaPohoral</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Numeson">@Numeson</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/verified">@verified</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/twitter">@twitter</a> and nobodies should not be verified because it shows a huge flaw in the Twitter system.</p>— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/statuses/480596045995315201">June 22, 2014</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>Shatner also feels that some jobs are "unimportant," unlike his job shilling for Priceline. </p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>I want to know how Engadget has all these seemingly unimportant jobs with all <a href="https://twitter.com/verified">@verified</a> accounts. <a href="https://twitter.com/Support">@Support</a> it's a mockery. Want names? Contd</p>— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/statuses/480591173988257792">June 22, 2014</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>Shatner feels wronged, and starts to plan a Revolution:</p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>Why is <a href="https://twitter.com/GineokwKoenig">@GineokwKoenig</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/RobertPicardo">@RobertPicardo</a> and so many other PUBLIC figures not <a href="https://twitter.com/verified">@verified</a> but a college student &amp; editorial asst are? It's wrong</p>— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/statuses/480599482275344384">June 22, 2014</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>Maybe I need to request to be unverified? Who wants to be part of a broken system that folks can pay $ or reward cronies while others wait?</p>— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/statuses/480604104566112257">June 22, 2014</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/verified">@verified</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Support">@support</a> unverify my account please</p>— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/statuses/480604371944624128">June 22, 2014</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>At press time, Shatner is <a href="https://twitter.com/WilliamShatner/status/481132195776450560">still Tweeting about it</a>, and is still Verified.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shady St. Luke's?]]></title><description><![CDATA[(By Anonymous) [No, not <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ">them</a>, but a well-respected writer who choose SFist in which to rant about their woeful experience at St. Luke's, using ...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2008/06/05/shady_st_lukes/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24342e44ad066cdcfaf08d</guid><category><![CDATA[misc]]></category><category><![CDATA[bill]]></category><category><![CDATA[hospital]]></category><category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category><category><![CDATA[rant]]></category><category><![CDATA[shady]]></category><category><![CDATA[st lukes]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:18:21 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry165198_thumb-thumb-640xauto-208281.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry165198_thumb-thumb-640xauto-208281.jpg" alt="Shady St. Luke's?"><p>(By Anonymous) [No, not <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ">them</a>, but a well-respected writer who choose SFist in which to rant about their woeful experience at St. Luke's, using a veil of anonymity. -- SFist]</p>

<p>The billing department at <a href="https://sfist.com/2008/06/05/shady_st_lukes/www.stlukes-sf.org">St. Luke's Hospital</a> in San Francisco is a shady operation. Last month we received two bills for about 250 bucks each. Our primary doctor is based out of St. Luke's, so most medical needs are taken care of there. One of the bills was for services this year, and since $250 is my insurance's yearly deductible, we paid it, no questions asked. But the second bill, you see, was for services from 2007. When we called St. Luke's to ask about it, they said that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aetna">Aetna</a> had paid for the services in 2007, but then "took the money back." </p>

<p>WTF?</p>

<p>So. We called my insurance, and asked them about it and they had no idea what St. Luke's was talking about, and told us to check our records and see if we had indeed paid them last year around the time the services were done. Alas, we checked our records, and could find nothing indicating that we had paid St. Luke's at that time, so: we went ahead and forked over the money.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jaywalking-- Smart or Darwinism?]]></title><description><![CDATA[You know on Market Street how there's that left-hand turn lane if you want to go on Valencia?  And you know how everyone likes to rush through when the light turns green to make sure they can get onto...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2007/12/19/jaywalking/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24276444ad066cdcf46503</guid><category><![CDATA[misc]]></category><category><![CDATA[jaywalking]]></category><category><![CDATA[Market Street]]></category><category><![CDATA[rant]]></category><category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category><category><![CDATA[valencia street]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:46:56 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry138808_thumb-thumb-640xauto-186370.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry138808_thumb-thumb-640xauto-186370.jpg" alt="Jaywalking-- Smart or Darwinism?"><p>How many ways does this piss us off? Like the fact if she just crossed Valencia Street, there's an actual crosswalk there. Or the fact that she still has to jaywalk Market Street even after jaywalking the lane, making it not a very smart place to jaywalk to begin with.  Or just the sheer fact that she thought it was cool to jaywalk in the middle of incoming traffic.  </p>

<p>Look, we jaywalk too.  A lot.  But we consider ourselves good jaywalkers.  We don't mind jaywalkers who are smart, but we hate jaywalkers who are stupid-- they give jaywalking a bad name (bad name). See, us good jaywalkers know that there's two basic rules to jaywalking:</p>

<p>-Don't jaywalk in the middle of traffic<br>
-If you're jaywalking with traffic headed your way, don't saunter across the street with a latte in your had and an attitude that there's nothing wrong with asking a bunch of cars to slow down just for you-- move your ass.</p>

<p>See, this way you don't piss off drivers.  Not to mention get friggin hit by a car.</p>

<p>Anyways, to you, Jaywalking Lady, since we didn't do this while driving yesterday, we'll do this now:<img alt="Jaywalking-- Smart or Darwinism?" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/sfist_jon/fu-emoticon.gif" width="48" height="48" imgclass="imgright"></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>