<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[newsweek - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:49:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/newsweek/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Upskirt Oopsie: Magazine Cover On Silicon Valley Sexism Called Out For...Sexism]]></title><description><![CDATA[Newsweek seems to have to resort to trolling to get your attention these days. This time, it's women they're trying to enrage.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2015/01/29/alas_poor_newsweek_once_the/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24332d44ad066cdcfa6d1c</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category><category><![CDATA[newsweek]]></category><category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category><category><![CDATA[susie cagle]]></category><category><![CDATA[tech]]></category><category><![CDATA[tech bros]]></category><category><![CDATA[women]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eve Batey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2015/01/newsweek_cover-thumb-640xauto-877901.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2015/01/newsweek_cover-thumb-640xauto-877901.jpg" alt="Upskirt Oopsie: Magazine Cover On Silicon Valley Sexism Called Out For...Sexism"><p>This week's cover. Will post first thing in the morning. <a href="http://t.co/UIgR97sHS9">pic.twitter.com/UIgR97sHS9</a></p>— jim impoco (@jimpoco) <a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco/status/560552144848162816">January 28, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>Alas, poor Newsweek.</p>

<p>Once the Pepsi to Time's print newsweekly Coke, in recent years the venerable publication was passed around more than your HBOgo password, briefly <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/11/11/the-daily-beast-and-newsweek-to-wed.html">married to The Daily Beast in a doomed ceremony officiated by Tina Brown</a>, then purchased in 2013 by IBT Media, a company that <a href="https://medium.com/@bpreeves/a-fool-and-his-money-are-the-new-owners-of-newsweek-financing-a-south-korean-cult-49b38946e1dc">journalist Benjamin Reeves alleges has strong ties to a San-Francisco-based Korean cult</a>.</p>

<p>Even Newsweek's relaunch under new management was fraught, with a first (online, it didn't <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/03/business/media/tiny-digital-publisher-to-put-newsweek-back-in-print.html">start issuing print copies until later last year</a>) issue cover story <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/face-behind-bitcoin-247957.html">claiming to unmask the creator of Bitcoin</a>, a report that's been <a href="http://www.mikehearn.com/Hosted-Files/Nakamoto-Could-Newsweek-Have-Known/">aggressively</a> <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/03/the-colossal-arrogance-of-newsweeks-bitcoin-scoop/">debunked</a> and left its subject <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/14/technology/nakamoto-newsweek-bitcoin/">plotting a lawsuit against the publication</a>.</p>

<p>So what's left, I guess, except to troll? At least, that was how many responded when <a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco/status/560552144848162816">Newsweek's Editor in Chief, Jim Impoco tweeted their newest issue's cover</a> from <a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco">his — preposterously — verified (5014 followers gets you verified these days?  OK!) account</a> on Wednesday night.</p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>It's amazing how antifeminist trolly <a href="https://twitter.com/Newsweek">@Newsweek</a> has become <a href="https://twitter.com/raduede">@raduede</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco">@jimpoco</a> But let's remember: sexist covers aren't even new for the mag.</p>— Jennifer L. Pozner (@jennpozner) <a href="https://twitter.com/jennpozner/status/560849250238889984">January 29, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>.<a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco">@jimpoco</a>: Cover is a great way to get a response but it's so disappointing. What an insult to the women of Silicon Valley.</p>— Hoa Quách (@hoamquach) <a href="https://twitter.com/hoamquach/status/560570610170859521">January 28, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>.<a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco">@jimpoco</a> This is garbage.</p>— David Kaib (@DavidKaib) <a href="https://twitter.com/DavidKaib/status/560576147059388416">January 28, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>You get the picture.</p>

<p>But, according to Impoco, the cover was apparently a group effort, from a bunch of women!</p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p>.<a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco">@jimpoco</a> Honest question: how many women were involved in the creation and selection of this cover art?</p>— Robyn Swirling (@RSwirling) <a href="https://twitter.com/RSwirling/status/560574383920381953">January 28, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/RSwirling">@RSwirling</a> About 6.</p>— jim impoco (@jimpoco) <a href="https://twitter.com/jimpoco/status/560575119395794944">January 28, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>The "about" is especially interesting. Does Newsweek have half-women in their office? Quarter-women?  Do they have <a href="http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=2578">snails on staff</a>? </p>

<p>If you're interested in reading a bunch more angry tweets about the cover, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/newsweek-cover-on-silicon-valley-sexism-lights-up-twitter/">Mediaite's aggregated a lot of 'em here</a>. But <a href="http://www.adweek.com/fishbowlny/newsweek-cover-on-sexism-draws-outrage/330409">media site Fishbowl NY's Chris O'Shea</a> was dismissive of these complaints, saying that "there’s no reason for outrage," and that if tweeters "read the accompanying article, they’d see that the cover is almost perfect."</p>

<p>And he's not wrong, in that <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2015/02/06/what-silicon-valley-thinks-women-302821.html">the article the cover refers to</a> is actually fine! By <a href="http://www.ninaburleigh.com/">award-winning journo Nina Burleigh</a>, it does a deft job of discussing the challenges women face in the male-dominated tech industry (as women have in many other male dominated industries throughout the ages, I will note before you accuse me/SFist of being "anti-tech").  </p>

<p>"However, it definitely conveys that Silicon Valley sees women as objects, and that’s a big problem. Which is exactly what the Newsweek cover story explains," <a href="http://www.adweek.com/fishbowlny/newsweek-cover-on-sexism-draws-outrage/330409">O'Shea scolds</a>.</p>

<p>Whatever the case, we'll leave the last word to SFist pal <a href="http://susie-c.tumblr.com/">Susie Cagle</a>, as her animation seems to encapsulate Newsweek's entire bag quite neatly. Push play now!</p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en">
<p><a href="http://t.co/FZYrjTVbde">pic.twitter.com/FZYrjTVbde</a></p>— Susie Cagle (@susie_c) <a href="https://twitter.com/susie_c/status/560575265219153920">January 28, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[<em>Newsweek</em> to Newsom: Implosion Impending]]></title><description><![CDATA[Topped off with one of the harshest headlines aimed at Gavin Newsom yet ("The Impending Implosion of CA Gov Hopeful Gavin Newsom"), <em>Newsweek</em> scribe <a href="http://daviswiki.org/Daniel_Stone"...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/10/06/newsweek_to_newsom_youre_going_to_i/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242fa844ad066cdcf8a7f7</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[election 2010]]></category><category><![CDATA[Governor]]></category><category><![CDATA[Newsom]]></category><category><![CDATA[newsweek]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:00:49 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/10/king_dome_implosion-thumb-640xauto-446394.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/10/king_dome_implosion-thumb-640xauto-446394.jpg" alt="<em>Newsweek</em> to Newsom: Implosion Impending"><p></p>

<p>Topped off with one of the harshest headlines aimed at Gavin Newsom yet ("The Impending Implosion of CA Gov Hopeful Gavin Newsom"), <em>Newsweek</em> scribe <a href="http://daviswiki.org/Daniel_Stone">Daniel Stone</a> says that the San Francisco Mayor's current white-hot streak in the relatively nascent gubernatorial race is in danger of cooling off. Fast.</p>

<p>With Clinton's early endorsement -- a move that's more of a stab at Jerry Brown, less so any swooning over <a href="http://www.ehow.com/how_2072642_teach-kids-recycle.html">Newsom's plan to save California</a>  -- Stone wonders what else Newsom do until election time.</p>

<blockquote>A powerful endorsement is something normally saved to be witnessed by the maximum number of cameras and undecided voters. Used wisely, it’s a valuable weapon: if Newsom were locked in dead heat with a primary or even general election opponent, a thumbs up from Clinton could give him a boost. But rolling out the big guns before most candidates have even declared strikes of desperation, rather than strength.</blockquote>

<p>As Stone goes on to point out, if Newsom can siren in much-needed money (likely) or procure smoke and mirrors in the form of an Oprah-like endorsement (unlikely), he could possibly squeak by. But just barely.</p>

<p>Also, in related news, Newsom and Brown tied in <a href="http://sfist.com/2009/09/29/poll_choose_your_next_governor.php">SFist's most recent highly unscientific poll</a>. </p>

<p>Also plus, in somewhat related news, Brown attended a fundraiser for <a href="https://sfist.com/2009/10/06/newsweek_to_newsom_youre_going_to_i/Republican%20District%20Attorney%20Mike%20Ramos.">Republican DA Mike Ramos</a>, prompting Newsom to create <a href="http://www.gavinnewsom.com/actions/petition">this time-wasting petition</a> asking Jerry Brown "not to raise money for right-wing Republican politicians who will take California in the wrong direction."<br>
</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[San Francisco Wastewater Treatment Facility Becoming Popular Tourist Destination]]></title><description><![CDATA[Last year's ballot measure to change the <a href="http://sfwater.org/mto_main.cfm/MC_ID/14/MSC_ID/117/MTO_ID/218">Oceanside Wastewater Treatment Facility's</a> name in honor of <a href="http://sfist.c...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/05/11/sf_sewage_treatment_plant_becoming_3/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242ca844ad066cdcf718ca</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[newsweek]]></category><category><![CDATA[oddball destinations]]></category><category><![CDATA[sewage]]></category><category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category><category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment facility]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leanne Maxwell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:30:41 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/05/wastewatertreatment-thumb-640xauto-214769.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/05/wastewatertreatment-thumb-640xauto-214769.jpg" alt="San Francisco Wastewater Treatment Facility Becoming Popular Tourist Destination"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span>Last year's ballot measure to change the <a href="http://sfwater.org/mto_main.cfm/MC_ID/14/MSC_ID/117/MTO_ID/218">Oceanside Wastewater Treatment Facility's</a> name in honor of <a href="http://sfist.com/2008/03/31/presidential_me_1.php">George W. Bush</a> is undoubtedly partially responsible for the influx of tourists checking out the inner-workings of the San Francisco sewage system. <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/196249">Newsweek</a> reports that offbeat (and free) destinations are increasing in popularity, as we're all becoming more budget-conscious. A <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/196249/output/comments">commenter</a> on Newsweek also credits Discovery Channel's "<a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/fansites/dirtyjobs/dirtyjobs.html">Dirty Jobs</a>" for demonstrating that weird and nitty-gritty places can be fun. Our most memorable field trip in middle school was when our environmental science class visited the local waste facility in the mid-80s. We were so ahead of our time!</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>