<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[democracy - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:00:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/democracy/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Are Americans Just Too Dumb For Democracy?]]></title><description><![CDATA[We'll admit we've often asked ourselves this same question ... but now some actual scientists have gone ahead and put the scientific stamp of authority on the notion that if a person is kind of dumb, ...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2012/03/09/are_americans_just_too_dumb_for_dem/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24282c44ad066cdcf4ce43</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category><category><![CDATA[rick santorum]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Barmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:00:02 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2012/03/30-rock-idiot-pride-thumb-640xauto-699451.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2012/03/30-rock-idiot-pride-thumb-640xauto-699451.jpg" alt="Are Americans Just Too Dumb For Democracy?"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span>We'll admit we've often asked ourselves this same question ... but now some actual scientists have gone ahead and put the scientific stamp of authority on the notion that if a person is kind of dumb, they are not capable of judging whether another person's idea is dumb, and therefore they are bound to make a stupid choice in an election.</p>

<p>Also, "with incompetence comes the illusion of superiority."</p>

<p>Cornell psychologist David Dunning and colleague Justin Kruger are responsible for the study, reported on by <a href="http://www.livescience.com/18706-people-smart-democracy.html">LiveScience</a> (and it's making <a href="http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/03/09/scientists-say-america-is-too-dumb-for-democracy-to-thrive/?tsp=1">SFGate commenters go batshit</a>, of course), and a sociologist in Germany has already used their findings to build a computer model of a democratic election, showing that people will always end up electing someone with "slightly above-average leadership skills," as opposed to people with really great leadership skills, because most people aren't good leaders and aren't capable of recognizing them either.</p>

<p>Anyway, we just have one word for you to support their thesis: <a href="http://gothamist.com/tags/ricksantorum">Santorum</a>.</p>

<p>[<a href="http://www.livescience.com/18706-people-smart-democracy.html">Live Science</a>]<br>
[<a href="http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/03/09/scientists-say-america-is-too-dumb-for-democracy-to-thrive/?tsp=1">SF Gate</a>]</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Finally, Some Prop 8 Leaders Who Aren't Afraid of a Little Fight]]></title><description><![CDATA[Back in October, the Yes on 8 "people" challenged California's Superintendent of Schools, Jack O'Connell, to a debate about gay marriage. According to Yes, even the remotest possibility of learning an...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/01/01/finally_some_prop_8_people_who_aren/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24234744ad066cdcf24058</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[activism]]></category><category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category><category><![CDATA[children]]></category><category><![CDATA[debate]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[gay]]></category><category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category><category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category><category><![CDATA[steve smith]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Baume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:27:39 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/01/no-thumb-640xauto-52717.png" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/01/no-thumb-640xauto-52717.png" alt="Finally, Some Prop 8 Leaders Who Aren't Afraid of a Little Fight"><p><br>
Back in October, the Yes on 8 "people" challenged California's Superintendent of Schools, Jack O'Connell, to a debate about gay marriage. According to Yes, even the remotest possibility of learning anything about gay marriage is harmful to children. Nothing hateful about that!</p>

<p>Anyway, the  side refuse to debate. In fact, not only did (self-described) Campaign Manager Steve Smith hide from the debate, but his response was obscured from public view in a hard-to-find PDF. (But we <a href="http://www.noonprop8.com/articles/2008/10/28/no-on-prop-8-responds-to-debate-request-from-frank-schubert/">dug up the text</a> and included it after the jump.)</p>

<p>But now there's a debate happening for real! <a href="http://www.townhall-la.org/programs/register/1256">Gloria Allred and Andy Pugno will argue about how California defines marriage</a> On January 14 at The National Center for the Preservation of Democracy, 111 North Central Ave, Los Angeles. (Gloria is one of the lawyers suing to overturn Prop 8; Andy is a lawyer who opposes <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_1">California's equal protection clause</a>.) Tickets are $20, and throwing of vegetables is strictly forbidden.</p>

<p>This is a fight that, obviously, the gays will win in the long run. In fact, the run probably isn't even that long. Getting the anti-marriage folks on record, explaining just how crazy their position is, can only hasten along the cause of civil equality.</p>

<p><i>Disclosure: SFist_Matt is the creator of <a href="http://stop8.org">Stop8.org</a>, and does behind-the-scenes organizing for the gars.</i></p><i>No</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Insert Clever Feature Title Here]]></title><description><![CDATA[Since we've been doing a bunch of postings about our super-exciting congressional race, we'd love to come up with some clever title along the lines of "Everybody Hates Chris" but we are coming up with...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2006/10/30/insert_clever_feature_title_here/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24326444ad066cdcfa04fc</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[Bay Guardian]]></category><category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category><category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category><category><![CDATA[dance]]></category><category><![CDATA[death]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Everybody Hates Chris]]></category><category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category><category><![CDATA[Green]]></category><category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category><category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category><category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category><category><![CDATA[Krissy Keefer]]></category><category><![CDATA[LA]]></category><category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category><category><![CDATA[love]]></category><category><![CDATA[Luggage Store]]></category><category><![CDATA[Madame Speaker]]></category><category><![CDATA[Mike DeNunzio]]></category><category><![CDATA[News+Sports]]></category><category><![CDATA[people]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[race]]></category><category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category><category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[travel]]></category><category><![CDATA[warfield]]></category><category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category><category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:42:22 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry80686_thumb-thumb-640xauto-116855.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry80686_thumb-thumb-640xauto-116855.jpg" alt="Insert Clever Feature Title Here"><p>Needless to say, we do have some Pelosi &amp; Pals news today as the Washington Post has a big feature on some <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/29/AR2006102900628.html">anti-lobbying bill</a> she's been working on for awhile that could see the light of day if she does become Madame Speaker.  Lots of bans on travel and gifts are involved and we'll see what happens the moment she does become Madame Speaker.  Our guess is that it'll pass with loopholes a' plenty.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, that weird disconnect between SF and the rest of the country over the "alleged" liberal-ness of Ms. Pelosi is becoming a national story as the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-sanfran30oct30,0,7328529.story?coll=la-home-headlines">LA Times</a> is now reporting on it and from there, it made it's way to <a href="http://www.wonkette.com/politics/dianne-feinstein/nancy-pelosi-doesnt-care-about-liberals-211037.php">Wonkette</a>.  We love reading people snarking on the Bay Guardian from all the way in D.C.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, the <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2006/10/20/debate_the_power.php">Ignored Three</a>-- Krissy Keefer (Green Party), Philip Berg (Libertarian Party) and Mike DeNunzio (Republican Party)-- are going to <a href="http://www.krissyforcongress.com">have a debate</a> despite the lack of attendance on the person they're trying to replace.  It will be Nov. 1 at 4 PM at the <a href="http://www.luggagestoregallery.org/">Luggage Store</a>.  The Luggage Store?  Couldn't they at least pick a place that says political seriousness?  Was the bowling alley at the Metreon booked?  And at 4?  Who's around at 4 to attend a debate anyways.  </p>

<p>Afterwards, Krissy and her Krissy Korp are going to be headed to the Warfield where a <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/10/17/MNG9MLQN211.DTL&amp;type=politics">fund-raiser will occur featuring Pelosi and the Man from Hope himself, Bill Clinton</a>.  The vigil is a "Funeral for Democracy" rally and everyone will wear black and light candles.  Democracy's death, of course, is the result of a "dance-activist" who attends rallies for Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez not being deemed serious enough to be asked to an official debate.  If that isn't the death to democracy, we don't know what else is.  </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[SFist Interviews: SF For Democracy]]></title><description><![CDATA[Remember those heady days of 2004, when the Democrats thought they might have had a chance to take back the White House with Howard Dean?  Well, <a href="http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/a/059035.htm...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2006/10/13/sfist_interviews_sf_for_democracy/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2432ad44ad066cdcfa2ef2</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[America]]></category><category><![CDATA[cell phone]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category><category><![CDATA[Features]]></category><category><![CDATA[House]]></category><category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category><category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category><category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category><category><![CDATA[people]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[White House]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[rita]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:00:46 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry77849_thumb-thumb-640xauto-119374.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry77849_thumb-thumb-640xauto-119374.jpg" alt="SFist Interviews: SF For Democracy"><p>Remember those heady days of 2004, when the Democrats thought they might have had a chance to take back the White House with Howard Dean?  Well, <a href="http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/a/059035.htm">we all know how that turned out</a>.  But it turns out a bunch of people took that whole grassroots, Internet, "taking back the Democratic wing of the Democratic party" stuff seriously enough that they started a group called <a href="http://www.democracyforamerica.com/">Democracy for America</a>, dedicated to furthering the mission throughout all levels of politics -- from local to state to national. Members of their local branch, <a href="http://www.sf4democracy.com">SF for Democracy</a>, were kind enough to sit down with SFist and outline what exactly it is they do.</p>

<p>[*disclosure:  your correspondent has met some, but not all, of these interviewees socially before -- but is not a member of either SF for Democracy or Democracy for America.]  </p>

<p><b>So do I understand that one of you has a Howard Dean Scream cell phone ring tone?  Where do you download that?</b><br>
<b>Will Easton</b> (communications director):   That's me.  <a href="http://www.jivjiv.com/deantones">www.jivjiv.com/deantones</a>.  It used to be free, but unfortunately they forced me to start charging 99 cents for it.</p>

<p><b>What's your group's mission, and how do you differentiate yourselves from other local political groups in San Francisco?</b><br>
WE:  We want to take back citizens' ownership of our democracy by mobilizing grassroots participation in the political process.  About half of eligible Americans do not vote -- that's a huge problem.  San Francisco is a little better -- but we have a ton of room for improvement.</p>

<p></p>

<p>Picture of Will Easton and Howard Dean from the SF For Democracy website.</p><i>More of SF For Democracy's thoughts on local independent grassroots politics after the jump! </i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gastronomique: For Whom the Onion Rings*]]></title><description><![CDATA[It is kind of silly to assign politics to restaurants or diets. But <a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/29lhGyTOtiWGkLCWDJZZFg">Cha-Ya</a>, a relatively new Japanese restaurant serving only vegan food, s...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2006/08/18/gastronomique_for_whom_the_onion_rings/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2424a744ad066cdcf2f96c</guid><category><![CDATA[SF Restaurants, Food & Drink]]></category><category><![CDATA[abuse]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category><category><![CDATA[dining]]></category><category><![CDATA[Food+Fun]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gastronomique]]></category><category><![CDATA[Green]]></category><category><![CDATA[people]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[restaurants]]></category><category><![CDATA[Robert Jordan]]></category><category><![CDATA[Santa]]></category><category><![CDATA[santa rosa]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[Shattuck Ave]]></category><category><![CDATA[South Indian]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cedric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:37:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry63061_thumb-thumb-640xauto-124769.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry63061_thumb-thumb-640xauto-124769.jpg" alt="Gastronomique: For Whom the Onion Rings*"><p>Indeed, a young lady was reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805079122/sr=8-1/qid=1155878775/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-9386218-5618411?ie=UTF8"></a> one night, and we had to admit: with its mostly white walls, blonde hardwood floor and table tops, Cha-Ya is a clean, well-lighted place. The high organically shaped counter facing the window is ideal for solo dining with a good read.</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean%2C_Well-Lighted_Place">A clean, well-lighted place</a> brings us naturally to <i>For Whom The Bell Tolls</i>, as, like Maria after an intimate encounter with Robert Jordan, we felt the earth shake. Unfortunately, it wasn't due to the satisfaction of our carnal desires, can't be in a vegan place, could it?  It just so happened that the earth <a href="http://www.feminista.com/buttonwillow/?p=474">literally shook</a>, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/03/BAG29KADKF1.DTL">4.4 on the Richter scale</a> in Santa Rosa.</p>

<p>But it did spell out the question for us: is the food really this good, or was this just another quake? The answer is: pretty good, so that we even forget that no animal product was involved. You know, there are vegetarian restaurants which serve you meatless meatloafs made of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tofurkey">tofurkey</a>, and you think: this ain't right. Cha-Ya does not even pretend to replace meat, and just does its own thing, traditional Japanese way. For us, it's ideal: we are not conscious of eschewing meat, we're just enjoying a fine meal. Perchance he for whom this dishes is served is so satiated, as that he knows not it is meatless. We feel the same in South Indian restaurants (say, <a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/DuNCxruhIwjfTTHxtb8GAw">Udupi Palace</a>) where the novelty (to us) of the cuisine hides the fact that it's vegetarian.</p>

<p><em>* Punch line of a <a href="http://www.rhymeswithorange.com">Rhymes with Orange</a> cartoon last week</em></p><i> Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's Gonna Bring You Down.... Huh!  ]]></title><description><![CDATA[Well, we'll tell you right now to use a pencil and not a pen to write this upcoming date down -- supposedly, Guns N Roses (in this incarnation:  yes Axl, no Slash) have <a href="http://www.roadrunnerr...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2006/08/15/its_gonna_bring_you_down_huh_/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24273444ad066cdcf44945</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[apple]]></category><category><![CDATA[Arts+Events]]></category><category><![CDATA[Axl Rose]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chinese Democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category><category><![CDATA[Fiona Apple]]></category><category><![CDATA[fun]]></category><category><![CDATA[guns]]></category><category><![CDATA[Guns N]]></category><category><![CDATA[Guns N Roses]]></category><category><![CDATA[music]]></category><category><![CDATA[Rose]]></category><category><![CDATA[Slash]]></category><category><![CDATA[warfield]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[rita]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:49:01 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry62683_thumb-thumb-640xauto-125100.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry62683_thumb-thumb-640xauto-125100.jpg" alt="It's Gonna Bring You Down.... Huh!  "><p>Given lead singer W. Axl Rose's notorious, errr, let's call it "<a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1459114/12112002/guns_n_roses.jhtml">unreliability</a>," when it comes to concert appearances, though, make sure you save your receipt.  The site we found this info on cautions that these dates have not yet been officially confirmed by management -- and this paragraph is right above another paragraph that says "Axl Rose has been saying that the band's long-delayed new album  will be out later this year," so you should decide on your own just how much credibility you want to give these reports.  The <a href="http://www.ticketmaster.com/venue/229423">Ticketmaster site</a> for the Warfield doesn't have the show listed yet either.</p>

<p>And even if the show does officially get booked -- who knows how it's all going to <a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1535152/20060627/story.jhtml">end</a>? (You gotta check out how the summer shows in Europe <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axl_Rose#Recent_controversy">have been going</a> for Axl -- it's like he's Fiona Apple.)  SFist is so going to see if we can get review tickets for this show.  Maybe Axl'll get <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/page-six/post-reveals-axl-rose-tommy-hilfiger-fun-175328.php">attacked</a> by a fashion designer again!  </p><i>Chinese Democracy</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Warriors: Mr. Foyle Goes to Washington (We Wish)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<img alt="foyle.JPG" src="http://www.sfist.com/attachments/sfist_chris/foyle.JPG" width="250" height="186" img class="imgright"/>Hey sports fans, in case you missed Sunday's episode of "Q&A" on C-SPAN...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2006/03/05/the_warriors_mr_foyle_goes_to_washington_we_wish/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2426d944ad066cdcf41d1a</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[Adonal Foyle]]></category><category><![CDATA[Arts+Events]]></category><category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category><category><![CDATA[court]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[finance]]></category><category><![CDATA[Golden State]]></category><category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category><category><![CDATA[News+Sports]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[Bay Area Sports]]></category><category><![CDATA[Television]]></category><category><![CDATA[The Man]]></category><category><![CDATA[Warriors]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 03:48:53 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Lamb is a real sour apple who desperately needs a pie in the face, and C-SPAN is, well, C-SPAN, but his guest was none other than Adonal Foyle, Golden State's serviceable NBA center. (It's a good thing we were able to watch him on C-SPAN Sunday, because we sure <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/recap?gameId=260305016">didn't see much of him out on the court</a>.)</p>

<p>During the <a href="http://www.qanda.org/Transcript/?ProgramID=1064">hour-long discussion</a>, Lamb stiffly inquired about Foyle's Horatio Alger experience; probed his political advocacy; tip-toed delicately around the elephant in the room, Foyle's NBA career; and even got Foyle to read his neomarxist-leninist-maoist ode to CAFTA, "<a href="http://www.adonalfoyle.com/FC_poetry_corner.shtml#computer">We Too Can Build Computer Chips</a>." Stick it to The Man AF!</p>

<p><a href="http://www.adonalfoyle.com/press.shtml">Foyle isn't shy about getting his message out</a> there, and much has been written about his <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi%3Ff%3D/chronicle/archive/1997/06/27/SP13042.DTL">childhood</a> and <a href="http://counterpunch.org/zirin07162004.html">political activism</a>. He's a passionate advocate for campaign finance reform, and for all the right reasons too. Pointing out that if elections are for the public good, they should be funded for the public good, Foyle envisions a political system in which all segments of society have equal access. You're dreamin' big man, but we're with you.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[SF DocFest:  <i>Call It Democracy</i>]]></title><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/03/11/palmbeach.recount/"><img alt="story.bush.gore.florida.04" src="http://www.sfist.com/archives/images/story.bush.gore.florida-thumb.04" width="200...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2005/05/18/sf_docfest_call_it_democracy/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24296344ad066cdcf56ca0</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[Arts+Events]]></category><category><![CDATA[college]]></category><category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category><category><![CDATA[court]]></category><category><![CDATA[DailyKos]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Election 2004]]></category><category><![CDATA[electoral college]]></category><category><![CDATA[Kevin Shelley]]></category><category><![CDATA[movies]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category><category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF DocFest]]></category><category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[rita]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 12:25:46 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br>
This was our first time at the Li'l Roxie, and we hope it won't be our last!  (Please, please, say <a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/05/16/DDG0VCP0031.DTL">the rumors</a> aren't true!)  We squeezed past the teeny-tiny hallway and into a narrow, but comfy and well-proportioned closet, and settled in for <a href="http://www.sfindie.com/docfest05">SF DocFest</a> <a href="http://www.sfindie.com/docfest05/films/call_it_democracy.htm">electoral rage</a>.  We picked up a ballot on our way in -- an optical scan, where choices (or "ratings") are marked with a circle.  </p>

<p><a href="http://www.callitdemocracy.com">Call It Democracy</a>, by <a href="http://ww.mattkohn.blogspot.com/">Matt Kohn</a>, is an exploration of the problem of electioneering in the 21st century -- from the oddities of the electoral college to Supreme Court shenanigans to missing electronic ballots to Colorado's electoral-vote splitting movement in 2004.  </p>

<p>Okay, we're not too liberaler-than-thou to admit it -- electoral reform is really not the most interesting topic in the world to us.  So it's with a great deal of relief that we can report that this movie is  like one of those long <a href="http://www.dailykos.com">DailyKos</a> tinhat-wearing posts that you skip, or a long filmstrip with blue states and red states, or anything like that.  The clips are interesting!  The movie moves at a brisk pace!  We didn't find ourselves trying to gouge our eyes out with a stick!  That's good, right? </p>

<p>Cameos by stapler-throwers John Bolton <i>and</i> Kevin Shelley, after the jump. </p>

<p><i>Picture from cnn.com</i><br>
</p><i>not</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sophie Maxwell Pisses Off The Blogosphere]]></title><description><![CDATA[Well, when <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2005/03/21/first_third_friday_at_rosss_office.php">we suggested that Sophie start a blog</a> to help counter some of the diatribes by critics in her c...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2005/04/04/sophie_maxwell_pisses_off_the_blogosphere/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2428f644ad066cdcf5317a</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chris Daly]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chris Nolan]]></category><category><![CDATA[City]]></category><category><![CDATA[City Attorney]]></category><category><![CDATA[City Hall]]></category><category><![CDATA[Daly]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[District]]></category><category><![CDATA[Edward Champion]]></category><category><![CDATA[ethics commission]]></category><category><![CDATA[friends]]></category><category><![CDATA[history]]></category><category><![CDATA[international]]></category><category><![CDATA[money]]></category><category><![CDATA[News+Sports]]></category><category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category><category><![CDATA[Pier]]></category><category><![CDATA[Rules Committee]]></category><category><![CDATA[the city]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:37 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br>
Well, when <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2005/03/21/first_third_friday_at_rosss_office.php">we suggested that Sophie start a blog</a> to help counter some of the diatribes by critics in her constituency, we were only partly joking.  Sure, we were jealous that our friends in District Six <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2005/03/11/political_junkie_immovable_type.php">have a blogging supe</a>, and we don't.  But really, we tend to like Supervisor Maxwell, being the child of activists ourselves.  But her public perception is about to take a hit again, this time on an international level, and as usual, she doesn't entirely deserve it.</p>

<p>First, <a href="http://www.personaldemocracy.com/node/501">Michael Bassik over at Personal Democracy Forum</a> posted on <a href="http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/committees/materials/041489.pdf">a new city ordinance</a> [PDF] which, according to Chad Jacobs over at the City Attorney's office would require blogs with over 500 readers (uh, yeah, good luck establishing what site metric you'll use for that -- we use sessions, by the way) and that mention local candidates for office to register with the city's Ethics Commission and report all blog-related costs over $1,000.  Now <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/04/0149243&amp;from=rss">Slashdot has picked it up</a>, angering blog nerds worldwide.  In an update to his <a href="http://www.edrants.com/reluctant/001923.html">original post</a>, Edward Champion says that Greg Assay, an aide to Supervisor Maxwell, has assured him that <a href="http://www.edrants.com/reluctant/001924.html">blogs will be considered news outlets</a> and exempt -- which is awesome, because now we can wave that around when we <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2005/02/28/sfist_goes_to_city_hall_whats_up_with_sfpd_press_passes.php">apply for our press pass</a>!</p>

<p>We agree with Chris Nolan, who lays out <a href="http://www.chrisnolan.com/archives/000738.html">the history behind the ordinance in a great post</a>, when she points out that she's "[O]n record as <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C1774656%2C00.asp">favoring full disclosure of payments</a> made to anyone during a campaign."  And we're also going to agree with her assesment that this new ordinance is poorly conceived and written, not evil.  We certainly do our best to disclose our personal interest in a story, but rest assured that we're not going to be taking any money in exchange for positive coverage on SFist.  Though if you do have a pro or anti Chris Daly screed to promote, you can <a href="http://www.sfist.com/ads.php">always buy an ad</a>.  In the meantime, you can drop by City Hall and see what the Rules Committee (Alioto-Pier, Mirkarimi and Maxwell) <a href="http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/bosagendas/a040505.htm">has to say</a> tomorrow.  We're going to doubt that this passes on first reading.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Photogs Of The World: Unite!]]></title><description><![CDATA[Thanks to everyone who made it out in the rain to take pictures!  "Small but spirited" is always our favorite description of a protest -- and by our count there were at least twenty people.  Starting ...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2005/02/20/photogs_of_the_world_unite/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2430ac44ad066cdcf926a8</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category><category><![CDATA[civic center]]></category><category><![CDATA[comments]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Events]]></category><category><![CDATA[Features]]></category><category><![CDATA[fun]]></category><category><![CDATA[get out]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gonzalez]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category><category><![CDATA[Law]]></category><category><![CDATA[love]]></category><category><![CDATA[Matt Gonzalez]]></category><category><![CDATA[media]]></category><category><![CDATA[Michael Burns]]></category><category><![CDATA[muni]]></category><category><![CDATA[people]]></category><category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category><category><![CDATA[protest]]></category><category><![CDATA[rain]]></category><category><![CDATA[Technology in San Francisco & Silicon Valley]]></category><category><![CDATA[the Castro]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:44:45 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of the day was, "Did we win?"  By all indications, that answer is "yes," although the difficulty in declaring victory will be in proving the negative -- how will we necessarily know if people are no longer being stopped?  We'll give Muni a grace period to get the staff up to date on the policies <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/documents/michael_burns_response.txt">as outlined by Michael Burns</a>.  Our worry is that his response, like all the responses we've heard so far from photographers who've been stopped, is that the events of September 11th seem be the go-to justification for over-aggressive policing, when in fact that event is not relevant to the debate.  Why bother protecting the nation if the nation only exists because of our shared respect for the Constitution, Democracy and the rule of law?</p>

<p>We'll post some more of our own pictures after the jump.  In the meantime, we'd like to encourage everyone who attended to add their thoughts via trackbacks or comments, with links to their photography.  And hopefully the word will get out that if another photographer, journalist or filmmaker is harassed, we now have evidence that they can not be cited or charged.<br>
<img alt="IM002786_moving_train.jpg" src="http://img.sfist.com/archives/images/IM002786_moving_train.jpg" width="450" height="338" class="imgtop"></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Muni Photography Ban: Update]]></title><description><![CDATA[To follow up on <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2005/02/14/homeland_insecurity_photo_ban_on_muni.php">our previous story</a>, we're not sure whether the Muni photography ban is the biggest thre...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2005/02/15/muni_photography_ban_update/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24257c44ad066cdcf369fe</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category><category><![CDATA[books]]></category><category><![CDATA[breaking]]></category><category><![CDATA[Castro Station]]></category><category><![CDATA[comments]]></category><category><![CDATA[death]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Features]]></category><category><![CDATA[Jeff Veen]]></category><category><![CDATA[Law]]></category><category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category><category><![CDATA[laws]]></category><category><![CDATA[media]]></category><category><![CDATA[Merlin Mann]]></category><category><![CDATA[muni]]></category><category><![CDATA[News+Sports]]></category><category><![CDATA[photos]]></category><category><![CDATA[police]]></category><category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category><category><![CDATA[the police]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:39:59 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br>
To follow up on <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2005/02/14/homeland_insecurity_photo_ban_on_muni.php">our previous story</a>, we're not sure whether the Muni photography ban is the biggest threat to our personal freedom, but we have a feeling that if we don't blow this all a little out of proportion, it will probably be ignored.  Civil liberties in our country seem to be dying a death by inches, and what worries us more than simply having a rule banning photography on Muni station platforms is that it is being enforced without having been publicly reviewed or even codified in a legal document.  Secret laws selectively enforced is not our idea of Democracy.</p>

<p>First of all, Steve's story has been corroborated in many details by other sources we found in comments to both his own post and other posts regarding the issue.  For instance, <a href="http://www.43folders.com/">Merlin Mann of 43 Folders fame</a> relates the following tale in <a href="http://www.veen.com/jeff/archives/000685.html#comments">the comments to Jeff Veen's post</a> on the topic:</p>

<blockquote>"Except for the police intervention point, this is similar to an experience I had at Castro Station Sunday before last (2/6). I was taking <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/merlin/4389982/">this photo</a> and heard the voice over the Station intercom very pointedly announcing that taking photos on MUNI is illegal.

<p>"I walked straight over and asked what law I was meant to be breaking and under whose authority I was being asked to stop. They had no idea. I wouldn’t leave without a code that they could cite. Spent 12 minutes watching two workers flip through comb-bound books to find the reference to this notional law. After 15 minutes, one of the booth folk stepped out, and was very nice but not particularly helpful. I said 'Is this a city, state, or federal law that you claim I’m breaking?' and she said, (yes, I wrote it all down), 'I think it’s because of 9/11.'"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>When we emailed, he pointed out that "I don't have an axe to grind with those MUNI folks—whom I perceived thought they were just doing their job. I guess I'm more troubled by the idea that some apparently baseless legal zeitgeist might be allowed to persist at a higher level at MUNI."  Indeed.</p>

<p>Steve got in touch after we had emailed him and we had a lengthy chat about the incident.  Steve wanted to stress that no cause will be served by angrily confronting, verbally abusing or otherwise disrespecting Muni and law enforcement officials.  He comes from a law enforcement family, both his step-father and mother having been officers.  While the actions of the two officers in this case extremely upset him, it behooves us to remember that they are following the rules as laid down by their superiors.  Of course, in the end, we are their superiors -- hence the concerns over the lack of public information on the ban.</p>

<p></p><i><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/merlin/4389982/">Photo of Castro Station</a> by <a href="http://www.43folders.com/">Merlin Mann.</a></i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Political Junkie:  Number Crunching]]></title><description><![CDATA[Now, SFist and your Political Junkie are not really statisticians, but the preliminary data coming in from the <a href="http://www.sf-rcv.com/">RCV reports</a> compiled by the <a href="http://www.fair...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2004/11/12/political_junkie_number_crunching/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2429af44ad066cdcf58fb5</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[Adriel Hampton]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[District]]></category><category><![CDATA[Features]]></category><category><![CDATA[Heather Hiles]]></category><category><![CDATA[Mystery]]></category><category><![CDATA[Nick Waugh]]></category><category><![CDATA[people]]></category><category><![CDATA[Political Junkie]]></category><category><![CDATA[PoliticalJunkie]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[race]]></category><category><![CDATA[Robert Haaland]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category><category><![CDATA[School Board]]></category><category><![CDATA[voting]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[rita]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:04:39 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, SFist and your Political Junkie are not really statisticians, but the preliminary data coming in from the <a href="http://www.sf-rcv.com/">RCV reports</a> compiled by the <a href="http://www.fairvote.org">Center for Voting and Democracy</a> yield some pretty interesting results, as reported by the <a href="http://www.examiner.com">Examiner</a>'s <a href="http://www.adrielhampton.blogspot.com/">Adriel Hampton</a>. For instance, a full 26.5% percent of the voters (2,596 people) voting for Mirkarimi for first choice voted the Guardian-endorsed slate of Mirkarimi/Haaland/Feldstein.  Go <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2004/11/11/we_read_the_weeklies.php">Brugmann</a>!  And poor Robert Haaland, always a best man but never a groom -- 49.6% of Mirkarimi's support had Haaland listed as the number 2 guy.  </p>

<p>In other RCV-related news, there's a small tiff brewing over whether the Chinese-American community understood the new RCV system <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/index.cfm/i/111104n_rcv">or not</a>.  Critics charge that a large number of Chinese voters only voted for one candidate and that in subsequent surveys, a larger-than-expected number expressed either no opinion or dislike of the new system.  The RCV people have some methodological complaints with the critics' studies, which are summarized by <a href="http://www.adrielhampton.blogspot.com/">Adriel Hampton</a> too (scroll down).  (Ah, it reminds us of the heady <a href="http://www.mysterypollster.com">Mystery Pollster</a> accuracy-of-polling-projections days of three weeks ago.)  It seems to our non-professional eyes that Tsai and Sing may have done the traditional split of the Chinese-American vote in District 1, with or without ranked choice voting, but we don't actually know how to read these numbers well enough to figure that out.</p>

<p>Finally, as the numbers start trickling in and the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/index.cfm/i/111204n_taxdollars">absentee and provisional ballots</a> get counted (scroll down), it turns out turnout in the San Francisco elections was around 72%. (Sorry we <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2004/11/02/sigh.php">wrongly accused</a> you guys of not turning out earlier.) Lisa Feldstein has fought her way back to 3rd place in District 5 (fat lot of good it'll do her, but still), relegating Nick Waugh back to 4th, but Heather Hiles remains trapped in 5th place in the school board race.  No word if she's <a href="http://www.sfist.com/archives/2004/10/26/you_kiss_your_mother_with_that_mouth.php">calmed the f*** down</a> enough to <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/article/index.cfm/i/110504n_hiles">concede</a> yet.  <br>
  </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's My Name?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://dc.indymedia.org/index.php?limit_start=180"><img alt="Diebold Touchscreen Voting Machine" src="http://www.sfist.com/archives/images/diebold-thumb.jpg" width="200" height="195" border="...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2004/09/07/whats_my_name/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24275944ad066cdcf45e77</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[cookie]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category><category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category><category><![CDATA[poll]]></category><category><![CDATA[voting]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:06:39 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here at SFist we've been getting it from all sides as to what we should call ourselves.  <a href="http://www.sfist.com/">SFist</a>? <a href="http://www.sfist.com/">SFist</a>? <a href="http://www.sfist.com/">Friscoist</a>? <a href="http://www.sfist.com/">Bayist</a>? <a href="http://www.sfist.com/">Fogist</a>?  First off, you can use any of these to get to our site, so link it and bookmark it however you like - they'll all take you to the same great place.</p>

<p>Still, we want to hear from you, our dear readers, what you think we should call ourselves.  And just like Donald Rumsfeld <a href="http://www.jacksonwest.com/sfist_poll/index.php" onclick="OpenComments(this.href); return false">we bring you Democracy</a>, whether you like it or not.  Vote in our poll - and try not to be an a**hole and write a script or click and reclick for hours to guarantee your preferred result.  We're working on the honor system here, folks.  We'll leave this poll up all week and we'll reveal the winner on Monday.  If we detect any shenanigans, we're totally going to go back and check every hanging and dimpled browser cookie to make sure we're on the level.  <a href="http://www.jacksonwest.com/sfist_poll/index.php" onclick="OpenComments(this.href); return false">So vote already!</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[San Francisco's Three Ring Circus]]></title><description><![CDATA[For those of you who thought the lamp posts, telephone poles, and coffee shop windows in town look too empty, fret no more!  It's almost time for <a href="http://www.sfusualsuspects.com/nov04.htm">Sup...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2004/08/02/san_franciscos_three_ring_circus/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24255f44ad066cdcf35bac</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[America]]></category><category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category><category><![CDATA[California]]></category><category><![CDATA[City]]></category><category><![CDATA[coffee]]></category><category><![CDATA[coffee shop]]></category><category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category><category><![CDATA[District]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gonzalez]]></category><category><![CDATA[Green]]></category><category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category><category><![CDATA[Law]]></category><category><![CDATA[Matt Gonzalez]]></category><category><![CDATA[money]]></category><category><![CDATA[muni]]></category><category><![CDATA[Nick Waugh]]></category><category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category><category><![CDATA[Phoenix Streets]]></category><category><![CDATA[SF Politics]]></category><category><![CDATA[Presumed Guilty]]></category><category><![CDATA[Rescue Muni]]></category><category><![CDATA[Ross Mirkarimi]]></category><category><![CDATA[running]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco Board]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:40:39 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<center></center>

<p>For those of you who thought the lamp posts, telephone poles, and coffee shop windows in town look too empty, fret no more!  It's almost time for <a href="http://www.sfusualsuspects.com/nov04.htm">Supervisor elections</a>!  </p>

<p>The big news is, of course, that the current president of the Board, Matt Gonzalez, is <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/article/index.cfm/i/032904n_gonzalez">not running for reelection</a>.  He says he wants to work at 'a private law firm' (read: make money).  SFist can't begrudge him that - he probably just wants to <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2003/10/07/carollloyd.DTL">buy a house</a>, like every single other person in the City.  Rushing in to fill the vacuum of leadership in <a href="http://www.sfgov.org/site/bdsupvrs_index.asp?id=4385">District 5</a>, thirty-one eager Haight area residents have announced their intentions to run for the seat.  This includes Matt Gonzalez's campaign manager <a href="https://sfist.com/2004/08/02/san_franciscos_three_ring_circus/www.rossforsupervisor.com">Ross Mirkarimi</a>, a co-founder of the California Green Party, <a href="http://sulli.info/">Andrew Sullivan</a>, a founder of <a href="https://sfist.com/2004/08/02/san_franciscos_three_ring_circus/www.rescuemuni.org">Rescue MUNI</a>, <a href="http://www.nickwaugh.com">Nick Waugh</a>, who's already been endorsed by the Howard Deaniac spinoff <a href="http://www.sf4democracy.com/main/">Democracy for America</a>, <a href="http://www.phoenixstreets.com">Phoenix Streets</a>, who was featured in the documentary <a href="http://www.pbs.org/kqed/presumedguilty/index.html">Presumed Guilty</a>, about the San Francisco Public Defender's office, and 27 other candidates.  Those of you in District 5 should expect a large number of pre-recorded phone calls in the upcoming months.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>