<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[condo - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:20:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/condo/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco]]></title><description><![CDATA[A selection of new (and older) developments that most hideously mar our urban landscape.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2017/07/26/ugliest_condos_sf/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24250344ad066cdcf328ab</guid><category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[condos]]></category><category><![CDATA[gentrification]]></category><category><![CDATA[housing]]></category><category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Kukura]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:00:10 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2013/04/mission_bay_44-thumb-640xauto-787617.jpeg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2013/04/mission_bay_44-thumb-640xauto-787617.jpeg" alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span></p>

<p><em>One thing that San Francisco is most known for is its timeless and gorgeous historic architecture. The Victorian/Edwardian aesthetic that pervades our fair city, with its bay windows, decorative cornices, and detailed appliqués is what seduced many of us to move to the Bay Area, and what inspires so many tourists to still snap pictures of "Painted Ladies." But future generations will no doubt hate us for the boxy and Esprit-colored condominium detritus with which the most recent tech boom blighted our cityscape  if any of these ticky-tacky atrocities even last a generation, that is, given how little interest developers seem to have in spending money on good architects. I've picked out a few of the current most hideous condo complexes, but rest assured there are <a href="http://sfist.com/2015/02/17/new_renderings_for_7-story_condos_a.php">even uglier ones in the Planning Commission pipeline</a>.</em></p>

<p><strong>NOTE: </strong>This list only includes condominiums. Many of you rightfully despise structures like <a href="http://sfist.com/2013/11/22/luxury_nema_building_open_house_fea.php">NEMA</a> and <a href="http://sfist.com/2013/10/30/you_can_now_live_above_the_whole_fo.php">38 Dolores</a>, but these are luxury apartment complexes, not condos. This list contains only condominiums, though mixed-use condos are also included. Also, these opinions reflect those only of the author of this article.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/Linea_UglySF.jpg" width="640" height="480"> <br> </div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://sfist.com/2014/07/10/condo_in_new_linea_complex_apprecia.php"><strong>Linea</strong></a><br>
No matter how good a mood I’m in, this compositionally unsettling Safeway Heights condo automatically renders me hopeless and depressed. An aggressive and angular attempt at Modernism, the big glass collection of cubes makes no attempt at harmony. And those cantilevers announce to the neighborhood that they can’t wait to fall on you.<br>
<em>8 Buchanan Street, between Sanchez Street and Noe Street</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Jay/18718660340_3cc75542dd_z.jpg" width="640" height="427"> <br> <i> The Vida, and the newly painted New Mission sign. Photo: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/">Thomas Hawk</a></i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://vidasf.com/"><strong>VIDA</strong></a><br>
It looks like the earthquake already hit at The Joker’s hideout known as VIDA, whose form was dubbed “<a href="https://uptownalmanac.com/2013/01/new-gangnam-style-swagger-style-alamo-drafthouse-and-condo-project-approved">Gangnam style, swagger style</a>” by the Planning Commission’s Kathrin Moore. These disorganized zigzag boxes are detailed with a red and yellow color scheme that seems like a rich white designer’s attempt to convey a Latino feel in homage to those being displaced. This may explain why <a href="https://missionlocal.org/2015/11/sf-mission-condo-windows-smashed-in-direct-attack-on-gentrification/">vandals just can’t resist the place</a> with their “<a href="https://i1.wp.com/missionlocal.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IMG_0269-e1447894210993.jpg">Die slow, rich f**ks</a>” graffiti.<br>
<em>2558 Mission, between 21st Street and 22nd Street<br>
</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Jay/millennium-tower-new.jpg" width="640" height="628"> <br> <i> Photo: <a href="https://flic.kr/p/ptVZBo">Allan Ferguson</a></i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://sfist.com/tags/millenniumtower"><strong>Millennium Tower</strong></a><br>
How can we not include the <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/08/01/millennium_tower_next_to_transbay_c.php">infamously sinking</a> Millennium Tower, whose <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/09/08/prices_slashed_as_millennium_tower.php">unsold units</a> and <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/08/10/homeowners_in_sinking_tilting_mille.php">endless lawsuits</a> will make it <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/08/22/salesforce_tower_throws_shade_at_mi.php">the butt of jokes</a> for years to come. But let us also rag on its boring, fortress-like proportions that only a Cylon would love to call home. It’s hilarious to think that back in 2012, this sinking stinker made <em>Worth</em> magazine’s <a href="http://sfist.com/2012/09/17/millennium_tower_named_one_of_world.php">World’s Top 10 Residences list</a>.<br>
<em>310 Mission Street, between Beale Street and Fremont Street</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/Fontana_UglySF.jpg" width="640" height="480"> <br> <i> Image: Google Street View</i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><u><strong>Fontana Towers</strong></u><br>
We direct much of our fire here at the new generation of condos,  but these two abominations have been ruining San Francisco views for 55 years. There is somehow no 1960s fun in these monoliths from the 1960s, and not a single interesting material anywhere on the facade. But it’s more the beauty they block than their own inherent ugliness that makes the Fontana Towers reliably among the most reliably irritating eyesores on the skyline  and this development just about single-handedly launched a generation of protesters screaming "<a href="https://www.facebook.com/No-Wall-On-The-Waterfront-351865674888875/">No Wall on the Waterfront</a>," by the way. <br>
<em>1000 North Point Street, between Polk Street and Van Ness Street</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/IconSF_UglySF.jpg" width="640" height="480"> <br> <i> Image: Joe Kukura, SFist</i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://vanguardproperties.com/building/Icon"><strong>Icon SF</strong></a><br>
Hey, I’m all for combining different materials to get a nice exterior effect. But this awkward, colorblock monstrosity at Noe Street and 16th Street is a mashup of three different incompatible design ideas that just don’t speak the same architectural language. Adding to the total lack of focus, we have jutty, Tetris-like elements that make the facade more busy and not at all cute.<br>
<em>2299 Market Street, between 16th Street and 17th Street</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/20023rd_UglySF.jpg" width="640" height="480"> <br> <i> Image: Joe Kukura, SFist</i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.saitowitz.com/work/2002-3rd-street/"><strong>2002 Third Street</strong></a><br>
There’s <a href="http://sfist.com/2013/04/29/why_is_mission_bay_so_ugly.php#photo-1">plenty of Stanlingrad chic to hate upon</a> out at Mission Bay, but this grain silo concept is particularly bleak. Yes, I’m aware this work was designed by <a href="http://sfist.com/2017/04/05/starchitect_laments_sfs_obstructive.php">Stanley Saitowitz</a>, who has done <a href="http://www.saitowitz.com/work/">remarkable work all over town</a>. But the bunker mentality of these structures just isn’t pleasant, and feels like in this case Saitowitz got conned by a particularly aggressive aluminum siding salesman.<br>
<em>2002 Third Street, between Mariposa Street and 18th Street</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/298portola_uglyF.png" width="640" height="480"> <br> <i> Image: Joe Kukura, SFist</i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><u><strong>298 Portola</strong></u><br>
I’m forever enchanted with the kitschy, old-school motor lodge aesthetic of houses in the Twin Peaks neighborhood. But here we have this completely out-of-scale 80s McMansion that spreads a county jail vibe across an entire huge block of Portola Street. Puke-green bars cover the ground floor windows with ugly asterisks to further add to the overall unwelcomingess. <br>
<em>298 Portola Street, between Clipper Street and Burnett Avenue</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/arterra_Toastken.jpg" width="640" height="480"> <br> <i> Image: Toasty Ken <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/toasty/">via Flickr</a></i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.arterrasanfrancisco.com/"><strong>Arterra</strong></a><br>
What in the Hello Fresh is going on with the Atari 2600 graphics that adorn of the exterior of this Mission Bay collection of slabs? There is all manner of fug going up near the 4th Street and King Street Caltrain station and the ballpark these days, but the inconsistently arranged shower of little orange lasers makes this structure really stand out. Further, it comes across as three differently sized and shaped buildings that were crunched together and just can't find their proper harmony.<br>
<em>300 Berry Street, between 5th Street and the 280 </em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/TheCentury_UglySF.jpg" width="640" height="480"> <br> <i> Image: Joe Kukura, SFist</i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.thecentursf.com/"><strong>The Century</strong></a><br>
Visually uninviting and inhumane, The Century makes Market street a lot less pleasant with drab gray paneling and ground-level reflective glass. Those balconies appear too small to be usable, and this building will age even less well than most of the unremovable architectural horrors on Market Street. Because peep those drainhole circles near the parapet, they’ll only get uglier over time as water stains accumulate.<br>
<em>2200 Market, between Sanchez Street and Noe Street</em></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"> <div class="image-none"> <img alt="The 10 Ugliest Condo Buildings In San Francisco" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/SFist_Joe/ThePlams_SFUgly.jpg" width="640" height="426"> <br> <i> Image: The Palms San Francisco <a href="https://www.facebook.com/pg/The-Palms-San-Francisco-367243074011/photos/?ref=page_internal">via Facebook</a></i>
</div> </span></p>

<p><u><strong>The Palms</strong></u><br>
Completely overwhelming and incongruous with its surroundings, The Palms is sort of a Walmart attempt at an Art Deco scheme. I’ve seen airport hotels that were more inspired than this, and it hulks over the neighborhood in a way that’s pretentiously out of scale. Just to drive home its ethic of excess, The Palms once offered <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/10/06/thursday_morning_roundup_an_sf_stud.php">a studio with 116 parking spaces</a>.<br>
<em>555 4th Street, between Bryant Street and Brannan Street<br>
</em></p>

<p><strong>Related:</strong> <a href="http://sfist.com/2017/07/17/polarizing_sf_federal_building_mark.php#photo-1">Polarizing SF Federal Building Marks 10 Years Since Completion</a></p><i> Image: Joe Kukura, SFist</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA["Let's All Go Condo, Shall We?", Says Gavin]]></title><description><![CDATA[The SF Examiner is reporting that <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/under-the-dome/Condo-proposal-may-meet-backlash-79590097.html">Mayor Newsom has thrown about the stunningly original ...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/12/18/lets_all_go_condo_shall_we_says_gav/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242f0f44ad066cdcf85b33</guid><category><![CDATA[misc]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]></category><category><![CDATA[housing]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:31:26 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/12/oldlady-thumb-640xauto-467442.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/12/oldlady-thumb-640xauto-467442.jpg" alt=""Let's All Go Condo, Shall We?", Says Gavin"><p>The SF Examiner is reporting that <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/under-the-dome/Condo-proposal-may-meet-backlash-79590097.html">Mayor Newsom has thrown about the stunningly original idea of ditching the city's condo lottery and just letting anyone who wants to go condo, GO CONDO</a>!  Currently, the condo lottery allows for only 200 conversions per year, thus protecting the city's notorious multitudes of little old ladies from being evicted from their dirt cheap apartments and tossed into the cold, unforgiving streets.  The silver lining to this real estate storm cloud?  Millions of American dollars rolling into city coffers to fund very important programs such as the Bevan Dufty brand "<a href="http://sfist.com/2009/06/04/bevan_dufty_wants_pink_cloud_to_hov.php">Pink Clouds over the Castro</a>" and the Mayor's warning labels on everything plan.  Gee!  </p>

<p>For their part, the Board of Supervisors reportedly had a hearty laugh at the proposal before returning to the business of reality on their planet.  Spitfire Supervisor and Solano County home owner, Chris Daly, said, "(It) could go straight to Mother Teresa and it's still a bad idea."  Um, Mother Teresa is dead.  Nice one, Chris.<br>
</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Quote du Jour: Concierge Out / Key Card In]]></title><description><![CDATA[It seems real estate construction types are finally -- <em>finally!</em> -- realizing in 2009 that no one can afford their mindnumbingly thoughtless, albeit impressive and mildly erotic, InfinityBeaco...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/06/29/quote_du_jour_concierge_out_key_car/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24252744ad066cdcf33bcd</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[housing]]></category><category><![CDATA[luxury]]></category><category><![CDATA[quote du jour]]></category><category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category><category><![CDATA[recession]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:19:22 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/06/Infinity Tower 1 2-5-09-thumb-640xauto-355341.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/06/Infinity Tower 1 2-5-09-thumb-640xauto-355341.jpg" alt="Quote du Jour: Concierge Out / Key Card In"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span></p>

<p>It seems real estate construction types are finally -- <em>finally!</em> -- realizing in 2009 that no one can afford their mindnumbingly thoughtless, albeit impressive and mildly erotic, InfinityBeaconOneRinconBLŪ luxury towers. <em><a href="http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2009/06/29/focus3.html?b=1246248000%5E1851903">San Francisco Business Times</a></em> has more, but here's a frank, death-of-fun quote from one of those coalition, do-gooder types. AHem:</p>

<blockquote>"The frills are coming out," said Tim Colen, executive director of the <a href="http://www.sfhac.org/">Housing Action Coalition</a>, who advocates for housing in the city. "No concierge, no fitness room, and much smaller units. <strong>These are the coping mechanisms for the new era we’re in</strong>." </blockquote>

<p>Alas.</p>

<p> goes on to say, now that the condo housing market has slowed down to a dead man's crawl, developers in San Francisco must focus on three things: "rental housing, cheaper midrise construction and innovative, new financing."</p><i>SF Biz Times</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cheapest SF Micro-Condo Ever?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Ready to throw down money for a place in San Francisco to (finally!) call home? Well, for mere pennies (i.e., $189,000) you can own this downtown micro-condo. This hypercozy 441 square foot studio, lo...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/06/22/cheapest_sf_micro-condo_ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24268a44ad066cdcf3f463</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[housing]]></category><category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category><category><![CDATA[small]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:30:26 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/06/small condo in sf-thumb-640xauto-334001.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/06/small condo in sf-thumb-640xauto-334001.jpg" alt="Cheapest SF Micro-Condo Ever?"><p></p>

<p>Ready to throw down money for a place in San Francisco to (finally!) call home? Well, for mere pennies (i.e., $189,000) you can own this downtown micro-condo. This hypercozy 441 square foot studio, located at <a href="http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Francisco/333-Grant-Ave-94108/unit-405/home/2038078">333 Grant Avenue, #405</a>, is smack-dab on the border of Union Square and the Financial District. While this pad looks perfect for, say, a blogger with a feline fetish and little belongs, it is pretty small. Cubix small, maybe. But seeing as how the place went for $234,000 back in November of 2004, reports <a href="http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/06/22/on_the_market_cheapest_microcondo_ever.php">Curbed</a>, it looks like the steal with this pricetag. Especially with such a choice location, and a pad featuring exposed brick and a washer and dryer. Check out even <a href="http://sf.curbed.com/archives/2009/06/22/on_the_market_cheapest_microcondo_ever.php">more shots of the small space</a>, and judge for yourself.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newsom Sells Bachelor Pad]]></title><description><![CDATA[Sleep easy, San Francisco. Mayor Gavin Newsom has, at last, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ontheblock/detail?entry_id=40267&tsp=1">sold his Russian Hill bachelor pad</a>. On the market f...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/05/18/newsom_sells_bachelor_pad/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24304f44ad066cdcf8f78d</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]></category><category><![CDATA[Newsom]]></category><category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category><category><![CDATA[Russian Hill]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:14:04 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/05/newsompenthousemainsold-thumb-640xauto-234521.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/05/newsompenthousemainsold-thumb-640xauto-234521.jpg" alt="Newsom Sells Bachelor Pad"><p></p>

<p>Sleep easy, San Francisco. Mayor Gavin Newsom has, at last, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ontheblock/detail?entry_id=40267&amp;tsp=1">sold his Russian Hill bachelor pad</a>. On the market for over a month, the spacious and too tastefully decorated penthouse condo, <a href="http://sfist.com/2009/04/24/price_of_newsom_condo_slashed.php">if you recall</a>, had trouble finding a buyer. Today, the apartment is in escrow. While the asking price was a cool $2.995 million, the sales price has yet to be revealed. Anyway, congrats, unidentified buyer. Also, all together now: oh, if those walls could talk.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Price of Newsom's Penthouse Condo Slashed]]></title><description><![CDATA[A month after being <a href="http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2009/04/its_three_weeks_later_and_theyre_still_asking_three_poi.html">on the market</a> -- with an initial asking price of  $3,200,000 -...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2009/04/24/price_of_newsom_condo_slashed/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24347544ad066cdcfb12a8</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]></category><category><![CDATA[Newsom]]></category><category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category><category><![CDATA[Russian Hill]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:01:56 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/1101 Green-thumb-640xauto-210159.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/1101 Green-thumb-640xauto-210159.jpg" alt="Price of Newsom's Penthouse Condo Slashed"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span></p>

<p>A month after being <a href="http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2009/04/its_three_weeks_later_and_theyre_still_asking_three_poi.html">on the market</a> -- with an initial asking price of  $3,200,000 -- Mayor Gavin Newsom's penthouse condo at <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;q=1101+Green+St,+San+Francisco,+CA+94109&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;split=0&amp;gl=us&amp;ei=6Q7ySevXBqSUtgO6ysTPCg&amp;z=16">1101 Green Street #2001</a> has plummeted in price. According to <a href="http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2009/04/1101_green_2001_live_large_like_a_san_francisco_mayor_o.html">SocketSite</a>, the asking price for his 1,693 square foot one-bedroom bachelor pad has been reduced to a mere $2,995,000.</p>

<p>Gav's Russian Hill penthouse is fully loaded too: full service doorman building, Art Deco building designed by architect <a href="http://www.classicsfproperties.com/Architecture/hcbaumann.htm">Baumann, H.C.</a>, and views of the Bay and three (3!) bridges.</p>

<p>If you want to purchase a but of Newsom -- and why wouldn't you? -- go <a href="http://sfarmls.rapmls.com/scripts/mgrqispi.dll?APPNAME=Sanfrancisco&amp;PRGNAME=MLSPropertyDetail&amp;ARGUMENTS=-N738380438,-N234337,-N,-A,-N18154814">here</a>.</p>

<p>Check out <a href="http://sfappeal.com/business_tech_re/2009/04/see-spot-write-a-tale-of-two-willies.php">even more pictures</a> of Gavin's gay pad.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Today In Stupid Real Estate Marketing]]></title><description><![CDATA[We were idiots this morning and clicked on a Google ad this morning for <a href="http://www.thehayessf.com/">The Hayes</a>, that new condo building on Page near Market.  We bike past it nearly every m...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2007/12/20/today_in_stupid/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242e2d44ad066cdcf7e268</guid><category><![CDATA[misc]]></category><category><![CDATA[condo]]></category><category><![CDATA[Google]]></category><category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category><category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category><category><![CDATA[realestate]]></category><category><![CDATA[thehayessf]]></category><category><![CDATA[websites]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[SFist_Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:06:29 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry138963_thumb-thumb-640xauto-186684.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry138963_thumb-thumb-640xauto-186684.jpg" alt="Today In Stupid Real Estate Marketing"><p>A player? In a real estate site? In our ideal world Real estate sites should show us what the place would look like were we to live in there instead of the kind of relaxing music that makes us want to go Lizzie Borden.  Even better -  sometimes the player doesn't appear, and you have to close your browser window to shut it up.  Ugh. We hate this website.  And now we hate the condo building.  </p>

<p><em>Why? Follow us after the jump!</em></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>