<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[bridge - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:04:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/bridge/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Google And Facebook Push For $3 Toll Increase On Bay Area Bridges]]></title><description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, tolls on the Golden Gate are now as high as $7.75.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2017/07/03/google_and_facebook_push_for_3_toll_1/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24286e44ad066cdcf4ed18</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[bay bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[mtc]]></category><category><![CDATA[tolls]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eve Batey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:30:46 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2014/04/bay_bridge_getty-thumb-640xauto-838729.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2014/04/bay_bridge_getty-thumb-640xauto-838729.jpg" alt="Google And Facebook Push For $3 Toll Increase On Bay Area Bridges"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span></p>

<p>On the heels of <a href="http://kron4.com/2017/06/27/video-golden-gate-bridge-tolls-on-the-rise/">a toll increase that makes travel to San Francisco from the north</a> a little more pricey, an even bigger jump for the Bay Area's state-run bridges is being proposed, taking tolls as much as $3 higher... an increase pushed for by companies like Genentech, Facebook, and Google.</p>

<p>We <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/12/15/cash-seeking_transit_officials_mull.php">first heard about this back in December</a>, when the idea was proposed during a Metropolitan Transportation Commission "workshop" at the Hyatt in SF. <a href="http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/matier-ross/article/Bay-Area-voters-may-be-asked-to-OK-bridge-toll-11261155.php&amp;cmpid=twitter-premium">According to the Chronicle</a>,  MTC members have since been in talks at the state Capitol regarding the proposed increase, which "could bring tolls on state-run spans to as much as $9 on the Bay Bridge, which has congestion pricing, and $8 on other bridges."</p>

<p>The additional revenue from the increase — estimated to be as much as $125 million per year — would go to traffic congestion-easing projects like additional BART cars as well as service to San Jose, work to build more high-occupancy vehicle lanes on Bay Area freeways, more ferry systems and express buses, and, the Chron writes, "the growing cost" of SF's new Transbay Transit Center.</p>

<p>It's the congestion management part of this plan that presumably attracted its high-profile supporters, many of which sport a workforce that commutes  per the Chron, "Two of the biggest players pushing for the toll increase are the Silicon Valley Leadership Group — whose members include such tech titans as Genentech, Facebook and Google —and the Bay Area Council, which represents some of the region’s biggest employers, including Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and UCSF."</p>

<p>“When you consider the huge amount of time that commuters waste in traffic every day," Bay Area Council spokesperson Jim Wunderman said in a statement supporting the possible increase, "adding a couple extra dollars to bridge tolls will help cut congestion and expand critical regional mass transit that benefits the entire Bay Area."</p>

<p>Ultimately, however, it's not up to lawmakers or these big companies, it's up to you: toll increases on state-run bridges (that's all of the bridges in the Bay Area sans the Golden Gate, tolls on which <a href="http://kron4.com/2017/06/27/video-golden-gate-bridge-tolls-on-the-rise/">increased to as much as $7.75 today</a>) must be agreed to by voters. And so far, voter support is looking good, as a recent poll performed by those high-powered corporate supporters say that "59 percent of those surveyed would support a $2 toll increase that paid for transit improvements, and 56 percent would back a $3 increase." </p>

<p>But we all know <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/03/politics/trump-brexit-polls-wrong/index.html">how reliable polls are these days,</a> right? According to the Chron, supporters hope to get the increase vote on June primary election ballot. Failing that, expect to see it in November, at the general election.</p>

<p><strong>Previously:</strong> <a href="http://sfist.com/2016/12/15/cash-seeking_transit_officials_mull.php">Cash-Seeking Transit Officials Mull Proposal To Up Bay Area Bridge Tolls By $3</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Report Reveals 2009 GG Bridge Suicide Count]]></title><description><![CDATA[A total of 31 people plunged to their death off the Golden Gate Bridge in 2009, a number slighter lower than the grand total for 2008.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2010/01/22/new_report_reveals_2009_gg_bridge_s/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2432fb44ad066cdcfa52fe</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[golden gate bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:10:23 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2010/01/TheBridge2-thumb-640xauto-475267.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2010/01/TheBridge2-thumb-640xauto-475267.jpg" alt="New Report Reveals 2009 GG Bridge Suicide Count"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span></p>

<p>A total of 31 people plunged to their death off the Golden Gate Bridge in 2009, a number slighter lower than the grand total for 2008.</p>

<p>"The 31 suicides in 2009 were three fewer than 2008, but higher than historical annual totals, according to a new report released by Ken Holmes of the Marin County Coroner’s Office, the agency chiefly in charge of reporting the incidents," <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Coroners-Office-releases-new-report-on-Golden-Gate-Bridge-suicides-82282772.html">noted yesterday's SF Examiner</a>." Since the bridge was built in 1937, more than 1,300 people have plunged to their death, which is about 18 a year."</p>

<p>But what about the prevention net under the bridge, you ask? Well, the $50 million steel net that would be located 20 feel below the bridge, has been stalled since "the bridge district specifically stipulated that no local money will be dedicated to the project." So, according to Paul Mueller of the Bridge Rail Foundation, they're looking to the federal government for help.</p>

<p>The report went on to state the obvious, <a href="http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Coroners-Office-releases-new-report-on-Golden-Gate-Bridge-suicides-82282772.html">explaining</a> that "research has constantly shown that suicides can be reduced if easy access to lethal means is restricted."</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Barrier to Cost $50M]]></title><description><![CDATA[Leapin' lizards! Estimations for the suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge, which initially ran anywhere from $15 million to $25 million, would now cost around $50 million, at least <a href="http:...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2008/07/08/golden_gate_bridge_suicide_barrier/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24241144ad066cdcf2a958</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[godlen gate bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:33:53 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leapin' lizards! Estimations for the suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge, which initially ran anywhere from $15 million to $25 million, would now cost around $50 million, at least <a href="http://www.marinij.com/ci_9811964?source=most_emailed">according to environmental assessment</a> released Monday by the Golden Gate Bridge District. The pimped out bridge might include the following: An 8-foot vertical fencing system to the existing 4-foot-tall hand railt; an 8-foot-tall horizontal fencing system to the 4-foot-tall hand rail with a "winglet" or panel on top; replacing the 4-foot-tall hand rail with a 12-foot-tall vertical fence; replacing the 4-foot-tall handrail with a 10-foot-tall horizontal fence with a winglet on top, for a total height of 10 feet; and installing a horizontal net system 20 feet below the sidewalk that extends 20 feet from the bridge. (But can't the distraught just jump over the netting after the first plunge?) The bridge sees an average of two suicides per month.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barge Hits Richmond-San Rafael Bridge]]></title><description><![CDATA[According to the Coast Guard, "a barge has hit the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge" around 6 p.m. this evening. <a href="http://sfist.com/tags/coscobusan">Yikes!</a> The barge, reportedly <a href="http://c...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2008/01/10/barge_hits_rich/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24238344ad066cdcf25e12</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[abc]]></category><category><![CDATA[bay]]></category><category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[coast guard]]></category><category><![CDATA[collision]]></category><category><![CDATA[Cosco Busan]]></category><category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category><category><![CDATA[oil]]></category><category><![CDATA[Richmond-San Rafael Bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco Bay]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Rafael]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Rafael Bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:57:38 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry141826_thumb-thumb-640xauto-189116.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry141826_thumb-thumb-640xauto-189116.jpg" alt="Barge Hits Richmond-San Rafael Bridge"><p>According to the Coast Guard, "a barge has hit the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge" around 6 p.m. this evening. <a href="http://sfist.com/tags/coscobusan">Yikes!</a> The barge, reportedly <a href="http://cbs5.com/local/barge.strikes.bridge.2.627554.html">carrying 63,000 barrels of heavy black oil</a>, hit the east piling of the west span. So far there are no reports of any injuries or leakage.</p>

<p>Ah, a light day. </p>

<p>Anyway, <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&amp;id=5884222">according to ABC 7</a>, this isn't the first time that a barge has smacked the bridge in question. It seems that "[i]n July of 2004, a 650-foot ship hit the base of one of the support towers...trying to avoid colliding with a sailboat."</p>

<p>We'll update you with any reports of oil spillage and subsequent finger-pointing and self-righteous outrage.</p>

<p>[Update: Team coverage here. Get the <a href="http://www.piersystem.com/go/doc/823/188305/">Coast Guard's POV</a> on this deal. Track the  oil skimmer courtesy of Boating SF <a href="http://www.boatingsf.com/ais_map.php">here</a> (It's just south of the bridge at post time.) The latest report is that the football field-length barge <a href="http://www.marinij.com/marin/ci_7939218">got dented 8 feet above the water line</a>. That's great news if this report pans out. </p>

<p>And people of the MSM, we know you mean to say "barrels" when you say "gallons". But c'mon, try a little harder. The barge in question has a capacity of 2.7 million gallons (or so) of petroluem, not 65,000 gallons as is generally reported. If a giant ripped up the barge in question and dumped all of its oil into the bay, that would be about 40 times more than what the Cosco Busan leaked out. A big difference. TYVM!]</p>

<p><em>Altered image credit goes to flickr's <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darinmarshall/5167773/">darinmarshall</a> (via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Richmond-San_Rafeal_Bridge_wide.jpg">Wikipedia</a>)</em></p><i>Clean Bay II</i>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Might as Well Stay at Work]]></title><description><![CDATA[Because you can't go home.  One of our guilty pleasures during storms is sitting around and looking at <a href="http://cbs5.com/traffic">live traffic updates</a> to keep track of the mayhem.  We snapp...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2008/01/04/might_as_well_s/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24328444ad066cdcfa1832</guid><category><![CDATA[misc]]></category><category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category><category><![CDATA[Contra Costa]]></category><category><![CDATA[mess]]></category><category><![CDATA[muni]]></category><category><![CDATA[Park Presidio]]></category><category><![CDATA[schadenfreude]]></category><category><![CDATA[Storm]]></category><category><![CDATA[the richmond]]></category><category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[SFist_Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:54:52 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry140864_thumb-thumb-640xauto-188272.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry140864_thumb-thumb-640xauto-188272.jpg" alt="Might as Well Stay at Work"><p>Anyway, as far as we can tell, if you live in Marin and work in Contra Costa, or vice versa, you can't get home because</p>

<p>1) The Richmond Bridge is blocked by a semi<br>
2) 101 is closed in both directions right where it intersects with 580<br>
3) Park Presidio is closed at Lake because of falling trees<br>
4) Doyle is flooded</p>

<p>Unless, of course, you take the windy Napa road.  Might as well stock up on vending machine food, commuters!  Be safe out there...</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>