<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title><![CDATA[aftershock - SFist - San Francisco News, Restaurants, Events, & Sports]]></title><description><![CDATA[SFist is San Francisco's source for fun, witty, & serious news. With updates about restaurants, events, sports, politics & more, SFist reaches millions of users in California.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/</link><generator>Ghost 2.12</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:39:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sfist.com/aftershock/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Aftershocks Rattled The Bay Area For Hours Monday Morning]]></title><description><![CDATA[Following this morning's 4.0 quake, things kept on shaking until about 8:30, just at a much lower level.]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2015/08/17/aftershocks_rattled_the_bay_area_fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c2430d844ad066cdcf93acd</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[aftershock]]></category><category><![CDATA[animals]]></category><category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category><category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category><category><![CDATA[quake]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eve Batey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2015/08/san_andreas-thumb-640xauto-907957.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2015/08/san_andreas-thumb-640xauto-907957.jpg" alt="Aftershocks Rattled The Bay Area For Hours Monday Morning"><p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;">  </span></p>

<p>That <a href="http://sfist.com/2015/08/17/earthquake_gets_your_monday_going.php">4.0 magnitude earthquake rattled us out of bed at 6:49 this morning</a> might have been the biggest bang of the day (we hope!), but that doesn't mean the Hayward Fault stayed quiet after that. In fact, things kept on shaking until about 8:30, just at a much lower level.</p>

<p>According to the US Geological Survey, the same spot near Piedmont that shook this morning has experienced seven additional aftershocks of note, from <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72507401#general_summary">a 1.6 at 6:52</a> to the last, <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72507486#general_summary">a 1.2 at 8:28</a>. The strongest appeared to be <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72507451#general_summary">a 2.4 at 7:40</a>, which <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc72507451#impact_dyfi">was apparently felt by around 81 people</a>.</p>

<center>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck">
<p lang="en" dir="ltr">The M4.0 this AM released 1/30,000 the energy of the 1989 M6.9.</p>— Dr. Lucy Jones (@DrLucyJones) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrLucyJones/status/633286285533155328">August 17, 2015</a>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</center>

<p>Of course, what everyone wants to know is if this morning's quake is a sign that something bigger is on the way. The answer? Probably not, but who the hell knows?</p>

<p>“At the moment," <a href="http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2015/08/17/hayward-fault-earthquake-shakes-bay-area-">USGS geologist David Schwartz tells KQED</a>, "it’s hard to say that this had any greater meaning than we’ve had earthquakes in this general area before.”</p>

<p>Keith Knudsen, Deputy Director of the USGS’s Earthquake Science Center in Menlo Park is a little more comforting. He <a href="http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/4-0-quake-rattles-Bay-Area-6448509.php?t=7c17748e5fbaa6eec6&amp;cmpid=twitter-premium">tells the Chron that</a> “There is a low likelihood that this could be a foreshock. There is a 5-to-10 percent chance that we could have a bigger earthquake in the coming weeks.”</p>

<p>The 6:49 a.m. quake didn't cause any major damage — some folks said things fell off shelves, and the Chron reports that "At least one traffic light at Geary and 20th streets in the Richmond District toppled over" (but <a href="http://sfist.com/2015/08/05/urine_trouble.php">maybe that was just pee</a>) — but it felt strong to many. That's because, Knudsen says, “It was relatively shallow and intense for a magnitude 4...People near the epicenter felt more intense than they would if it was deeper.”</p>

<p>All in all, the USGS estimates, about 40,000 people felt a strong jolt and 510,000 felt a moderate rattle in this morning's largest quake. 4.5 million people probably felt weak or light shaking.</p>

<p>And it wasn't just people: though my animals didn't notice a damn thing (they never do!), at least two Bay Area dogs did. Check it out:</p>

<p><iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uwORsemTww4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong>Previously:</strong> <a href="http://sfist.com/2015/08/17/earthquake_gets_your_monday_going.php">4.0 Magnitude Earthquake Gets The Bay Area's Monday Going</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[3.7 Aftershock]]></title><description><![CDATA[A 3.7 aftershock in San Jose just shook the ground of Silicon Valley. According to our own <a href="http://sfist.com/staff.php?sfist_spencer">Spencer Williams</a>, it happened a little before 4 p.m. a...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2007/10/31/37_aftershock/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c24280c44ad066cdcf4bb4a</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[37]]></category><category><![CDATA[aftershock]]></category><category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category><category><![CDATA[judge judy]]></category><category><![CDATA[maps]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category><category><![CDATA[Spencer Williams]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brock Keeling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:03:52 GMT</pubDate><media:content url="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry131308_thumb-thumb-640xauto-167124.jpg" medium="image"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://img.sfist.com/assets_c/2009/04/entry131308_thumb-thumb-640xauto-167124.jpg" alt="3.7 Aftershock"><p><a href="http://cbs5.com/bios/local_bio_114175155.html">Wendy Tokuda</a> looked mighty concerned and had the gall to interrupt <em>Judge Judy</em> just now, so: </p>

<p>A 3.7 aftershock in San Jose just shook the ground of Silicon Valley. According to our own <a href="http://sfist.com/staff.php?sfist_spencer">Spencer Williams</a>, it happened a little before 4 p.m. and It "only lasted a couple of seconds." So there you have it. </p>

<p>We'll <del>run it into the ground</del> update if there's more to report.</p>

<p>For more info on today's aftershock, go <a href="http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Maps/SF_Bay.html">here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whew, That Was Fun]]></title><description><![CDATA[9:30 Update: Things seem to be settling down. We're going to move the bulk of this post behind a jump. The only really big news at the moment is that there's a 30% chance of a strong aftershock in the...]]></description><link>https://sfist.com/2007/10/30/whew_that_was_f/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">5c242bf644ad066cdcf6b902</guid><category><![CDATA[SF News]]></category><category><![CDATA[5.6]]></category><category><![CDATA[56]]></category><category><![CDATA[aftershock]]></category><category><![CDATA[BART]]></category><category><![CDATA[Bay Area]]></category><category><![CDATA[bayarea]]></category><category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category><category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category><category><![CDATA[love]]></category><category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category><category><![CDATA[richter]]></category><category><![CDATA[Rock]]></category><category><![CDATA[running]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category><category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category><category><![CDATA[sf]]></category><category><![CDATA[temblor]]></category><category><![CDATA[Tila Tequila]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Baume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:05:55 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>9:30 Update:</b> Things seem to be settling down. We're going to move the bulk of this post behind a jump. The only really big news at the moment is that there's a 30% chance of a strong aftershock in the next week, and a 5 to 10% chance of another strong earthquake.</p>

<p>If you were lucky enough to feel The Great San Francisco San Jose Alum Rock 5.6 Back-and-Forthing of 2007, please continue to send in reports. We especially like links to blog posts about the earthquake, such as <a href="http://www.njudahchronicles.com/2007/10/the_non_halloween_schedule_for_1.html">Greg's</a>.</p>

<p>Finally, a headline's gone up on KRON's site; but the headline links to a story about the Berkeley tree sitters. Ha! Hey, we wonder if they got rattled out of their perch? Macherena reports that KRON's just been showing a static shot of a seismograph. Bet it sure would be handy to have a reporting staff right about now.</p>

<p><b>9:10 Update:</b> Cranky reports that MTV is showing reruns of A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila.</p>

<p><a href="http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/QuakeAddons/nc40204628.afterwarn.html">Regarding aftershocks, the USGS says</a>: <br>
</p><blockquote>... the probability of a strong and possibly damaging aftershock IN THE NEXT 7 DAYS is approximately 30 PERCENT. ...  there is a small chance (APPROXIMATELY 5 TO 10 PERCENT) of an earthquake equal to or larger than this mainshock in the next 7 days. ... approximately 15 to 40 SMALL AFTERSHOCKS are expected in the same 7-DAY PERIOD ...</blockquote>

<p>So there.</p>

<p>Here's where some of the aftershocks have landed -- as you can see, they're pretty small:</p>

<p><a href="http://sfist.com/attachments/sfist_matt/9pm.png"><img class="left" alt="9pm.png" src="http://img.sfist.com/attachments/sfist_matt/9pm-thumb.png" width="200" height="218"></a></p>

<p>BART's running its trains slowly, but with no apparent problems; PG&amp;E reports no utility disruptions. Some broken water pipes reported near San Jose.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>