Quantcast

Occupy Misguidedly Protests Small Business Tacolicious

tacoliciousprotest.jpg
(Source: Mission Local)

A group of Occupyists protesting Mission evictions on Saturday afternoon wrongly accused Tacolicious and its owner, Joe Hargrave, a small-business owner of evildoings. Brimming with Tea Party-like fervor, hope and confusion, "hundreds" of Occupy ilk (some of whom recently re-located to San Francisco and the Mission themselves) converged outside the Valencia Street location take action against evictions in the Mission. The group claimed that Tacolicioius, a noted restaurant serving titular tacos and more, wanted to evict the building at 739-741 Valencia. Problem is that Tacolicious doesn't own the building. They can't evict anyone. They don't want to evict anyone.

"Both diners and staff had no idea what was going on. And you know what, it’s likely that the most protestors didn't, either," reports Inside Scoop. And how. While righteous protesters shouted confused gems like, "The owners of Tacolicious want to evict us" and "A taco shop has been set up under our noses," the restaurant's owner had nothing to do with said evictions allegedly in progress.

Grub Street reports:

Several neighborhood-based, tenants-rights-focused protests happened Saturday in connection with Occupy SF, and the Mission protest landed in front of the new Tacolicious (741 Valencia) where some upstairs tenants claim they are being evicted. As it happens, Tacolicious does not own the building — business owner Joe Hargrave just recently opened in the space which is owned by restaurateur Jack Knowles, who himself plans to open Chapel restaurant and Preservation Hall West next door, sometime next year. Hargrave tells Grub Street that the tenants are upset to have new downstairs neighbors, but that he's confused as to how this protest took shape, especially since he's not aware of any eviction papers having been filed. "The Occupy movement showing up? That was really weird," Hargrave said. "I'm not the landlord. I wanted to be like, I get turned down by banks too, you guys. It was really nonsensical."

A chilling reminder that the road to Hell can be paved with good intentions and a few protest signs.

Mission Local's audio report below:

Contact the author of this article or email tips@sfist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • alwalden
    I see that this article is all about the insignificant matter of the landlord being inadvertently misidentified rather than about the many tenants who will lose their homes!
  • wheres mr eric sri telling us how they are right ! sorry but these people look stupid . a man who starts a business and goes to work has occupiers on his doorstep, id hit them with the hose !
  • Another triumph! 
  • njudah
    what a surprise. the camping club didn't do their homework and attacked a small business, instead of protesting events by MAyor 1% and the fundraisers for politicians. Maybe the cold weather will send the camping club home so those who actually care about income inequality and the like can do something, and the poopers can go poop elsewhere.

  • Spysea
    once again protesting and feet stomping for no reason ..... classic
  • Buffalobleu
    we're here, we're I'll-informed, get used to it!
  • fizzandpop
    Occupy is like John Coltrane. You think it's the shit, then you find out that your idiot cousin really likes him.
  • mmathers
    “A taco shop has been set up under our noses!”

    Really? In the mission? Oh, the humanity!
    -mm
  • Miles_Long
    I don’t know about you, but when a restaurant wants to open up in my neighborhood and they serve alcohol, there are notices sent out to the surrounding neighborhood to see if we residents are OK with the new establishment.

    Since Tacolicious serves booze, I’m pretty sure that the neighborhood knew of a new taco shop being build under their noses.
  • njudah
    shh! stop using facts, reason and logic it'll make the camping club more upset.
  • withak30
    New rule: Whoever is occupying the ground floor of a building is the landlord.
  • dronf
    I'll just leave this here....  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
  • fizzandpop
    You don't have to actually OWN a property to evict someone, just ask Bank Of America.
  • you must be dumb if you dont realize that when most people  "buy" their home that they are putting a down payment  and that the bank actually holds the deed, yes the bank owns your home . and b of a owns hundreds of thousands of them
  • fizzandpop
    I own a fucking home, dumbass. I'm referring to the fact that BofA et al are foreclosing on homes that they haven't lent against, have no paperwork for, and are outright criminally repossessing. Do you read the news?
  • i dont think you understand. you dont own shit . you have the deed to your house in a safe ?
  • beartrash
    The protesters must have assumed that anyone who'd put enough effort to own and run a business, must be part of the 1% and needs to have their livelihood disrupted.

    F' "the man"! (and his tacos!)
  • SFist_Jay
    you mean the 1%, but yeah
  • I'd broaden that to "anybody that pays their rent on time."
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@sfist.com