Quantcast

Chronicle (Reporter) Doesn't Believe In Publishing News That Hurts Their Feelings

delete icon.jpg

We're almost certain that more esteemed colleagues like Steven T. Jones and Joe Eskenazi didn't come across a request from a Chronicle reporter to unpublish their items on yesterday's involuntary layoffs

But we sure did.

Hi, Brock:

I'm a reporter at the San Francisco Chronicle and shop steward for the Guild. I just wanted to drop you a note about your blog post listing the names of those who've been laid off.

Several folks who've been laid off are extremely concerned about their names being posted on your site. They want to keep it as private as possible for a number of reasons. For some, there are emotional issues involved. But for others, there are much more serious ramifications to being laid off that have to do with their careers and personal finances.

Is there a way you could take that post down?

Thank you for considering. I really appreciate it. I'd be happy to talk to you about it.
- matthai C:415-xxx-xxxx

Matthai Kuruvila
Religion/Spirituality Reporter
San Francisco Chronicle
w: (415) 777-xxxx
f: (415) 896-xxxx
xxxxxxxxx@sfchronicle.com
www.SFChronicle.com

Does this mean the Chronicle is in the habit of censoring news that might cause, you know, hurt feelings? How often does the Chronicle unpublish news items that are true because of "emotional issues involved" or "serious ramifications to being laid off that have to do with their careers and personal finances?"

Prick the bubble, Chronicle. Only then will you truly be free.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@sfist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]