SFist: SF Sex Club To Hopefully Re-Open Soon

lardtub

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:30:46 -0800

Um, there are still prostitutes and circling cars over there. It is a dead street at night. What, did you think kittens would circle and roses would pop out from the sidewalk cracks when the PE closed? Get real. Why is it that the gay sex clubs don't take this kind of heat? Straight people need a sex club too. Craigslist just does not cut it.

gf

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:10:00 -0800

I'm as pro-sex as anyone you'll find in this town (it's true) but man, the PE was skeezy and gross.

Xof

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:28:50 -0800

This would be the same Mike Powers who, back in the mid-90s, attempted to use the Planning Department to shut down every BDSM club in the city except, well, ahem, Power Exchange? That Mike Powers? And now he's having trouble with the Planning Department? Gosh. That's a shame.

Eric Denman

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:32:15 -0800

maybe worth clarifying that the club was 13 years old, not its patrons.

adamjackson

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:39:07 -0800

Seconded. It was always fun send visitors there :)

Brock Keeling

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:16:41 -0800

well played, sir.

underachieving

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:14:04 -0800

Uh, kind of an unfair summary of what's going on there, huh Brock? It's not as if Ms. Dunmeyer has been the only person unhappy with Power Exchange's effect on her neighborhood; two other people were named in the city as not liking the club's proposed Gough location any more than than Dunmeyer did, and if there was a "flood of calls" to the SF Planning Dept., I guess a lot of other people didn't either? What is wrong with all these people, Brock? Didn't anyone tell them that they "were living in some sort of urban metropolitan area"?

Xenu

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:48:48 -0800

Thank god, now I'll finally have a place to send unsuspecting tourists again.