California is one step closer to getting Prop 8, the same-sex marriage ban that passed in November, overturned. Hopefully. A judiciary committee passed House Resolution 5 today (care of one Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco), which states that "a revision is a substantial change to the underlying principles of the California Constitution, or to the structure of California's basic governmental plan."
A similar measure, Senate Resolution 7 (care of the formidable Senator Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, has also been introduced. Leno's measure asks that California State Senate also oppose Prop 8 on constitutional grounds. It will be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee very soon.
The California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the legality of allowing discrimination into the state constitution on March 5.
Follow the jump to read the full press release in its entirety. And for updates on any and all news about about civil marriage equality, visit Stop8.org.
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE PASSES RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROP 8Ammiano Measure Supports Equal Rights
Sacramento, CA - Today the members of the Assembly Judiciary Committee passed House Resolution 5 (Ammiano, D-San Francisco) by a vote of 7 to 3, which resolves that the Assembly opposes the implementation of Prop 8. H.R. 5 states that Prop 8 is an improper revision of the California Constitution.
"I am proud of my colleagues and their unequivocal support of equal treatment for all Californians. This resolution speaks directly to the fundamental rights of same-sex couples to have equal protection under the Constitution, rights that cannot be taken away by popular vote. I am confident that the Assembly will support the repeal of Proposition 8 and confirm the basic rights of all Californians," said Assemblymember Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco), author of HR 5.
Dolores Huerta, co-founder of the United Farm Workers union, added "The Legislature again affirmed the rights of the minority to have equal protection under the Constitution. If Prop 8 is upheld, it would have a devastating effect on the hard won rights for women, minorities, and the disabled. We look to the court to extend equal protections of the law to all as the Legislature had done with the passage of the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act."
The resolution points out that a revision is a substantial change to the underlying principles of the California Constitution, or to the structure of California's basic governmental plan. As a result, pursuant to the California Constitution, the Legislature must initiate a change of this magnitude; it cannot be accomplished through the initiative process.
A similar measure, Senate Resolution 7, has been introduced by Senator Mark Leno (D-San Francisco). That measure resolves that the California State Senate also oppose Prop 8 on constitutional grounds. It will be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee soon.
The California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the legality of the state's gay marriage ban on March 5. On January 15, sixty-five current and former state legislators, including Assembly Speaker Karen Bass and Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, filed a friend of the court brief seeking to invalidate Proposition 8 because it circumvents basic protections required by our Constitution and eliminates a fundamental right for a minority of Californians.



Worth a read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority
Nice try guys but no cigar. This Resolution will have no bearing on the High Courts decision. This is pure Political Grandstanding at the taxpayers expense. Give them all a 25% pay cut.