As the SFMTA looks deep into the abyss of a budget deficit in the $40 million range, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency chief Nathaniel Ford has decided he wants to halt the annual $40K-plus raise and bonus coming his way. Ford's base contract salary, currently set at an envious $315,140/year, would have added a $13,236 raise and a performance bonus of $26,787. Aw. (SFGate)



You need to stop posting these, because every time I hear about Ford's salary I get angry. Does the city publish the basis for the performance related bonus? At least he has the decency to decline it.
But didn't we hire him for a mere $250k only a couple of years ago?
I just wish that someone could tell me,without passion or prejudice, what exactly he does to earn that $300K+ per year. No doubt that MUNI is an incredibly complex organization and a competent manager at that level should earn a good salary. However, I know many highly competent and educated executives making much less than $300K+ who would be fired in a hot minute if their organization suffered from such chronic and epic failure.
Wait, a performance bonus? As in he gets a bonus for putting on a show or what? Cause it certainly isn't because of a good job!
I'm more than certain that Ford makes more American dollars per annum than any other head of a large municipal public transportation agency in the United States. While 300,000 American dollars a year is an outrageous salary for what he does, he's not completely idle. The MTA has completed a much needed LRT maintenance facility, is attempting to address Muni's notorious inefficiencies with the TEP project, and continues to move ahead with the extraordinarily ill conceived Central Subway - all under his watch.
I will say that Ford and the team he dragged out here with him from Atlanta are among some of the best dressed men in city government (they are perhaps a bit too flashy for my taste, but still well dressed), so at least he is spending all his money on what really counts - clothes. I say give him another year to get the N Judah functioning properly before we run him out of town on a rail.
Many of the changes Nat Ford has made since he took over are low profile infrastructure things which are only now starting to have a real effect.
Take that new maintenance facility for example. Just because it's open now, doesn't mean the LRVs are all magically fixed. It still takes time to service each train, but at least now there is a modern facility to do it in.
Even without the facility, about 20-25% more trains are now in service than when Nat Ford arrived right before the start of the T-Line. At that time, he was given the task of opening a new line when there weren't even enough serviceable cars available for existing service. We probably all remember what a disaster that turned out to be, and it's not like things are perfect now, but it's certainly a lot better.
@Jamison
I had the pleasure of inspecting the new maintenance facility and Ford and his assorted fashion minions swore up and down that once fully operational it would help improve system efficiency significantly. This is why I'm giving him a year to get the N Judah running proper like. If in a year riding the N Judah is still a form of torture of which Dick Cheney would be proud, then I say Mr. Ford and his team should be promptly shown to the Daly City line and we should give his job to Annemarie Conroy or similar.
If we have to run him out of town on a rail then we will never be rid of him.
I'd recommend a better success metric than whether or not riding the N-Judah is torture. The system has been improving, but I wouldn't expect that to continue given the budget cutting that's been happening at all levels.
As for riding Ford out on a rail... what happens then? Some new guy will come in to find the same cash strapped system in need of repair.
@Jamison
I only ever really ride the N Judah and I hate it with a fiery vengeance. Therefore, the metric I have chosen shall remain in force! Sorry for you.
As far as some new guy is concerned, come now! You surely underestimate the vast talents of Annemarie Conroy! Though, as Withak has quite correctly pointed out, if we have to rely on a rail to rid our fair city of Mr. Ford, we'll be waiting long past Ms. Conroy's expiration date, I'm sure.
TEP looks to have plenty of terrible decisions as well as a few good ones. It also feels like a vague attempt to try to improve service by shuffling things around rather than looking at the deep and systematic problems our transit system has.
I keep saying it, but we need to have a proper underground system. Not the idiotic central subway, but a full system where we can actually get around town without being constantly stuck in traffic or trying to make the traffic even worse with new systems of right of way that won't significantly improve transit and will make it even harder to actually go where you need to be rather than where the city has decided you're allowed to go.
Like has been stated before all upper management of Muni should be required to rely on it for their commute and should be strongly encouraged to use it for personal transit as well. As long as our politicians never bother using it they're never going to work on actually fixing it.
Let's not forget the impact that the transit workers union have on making the system a complete failure with ludicrously high salaries. The blame comes from almost all levels.
about 20-25% more trains are now in service than when Nat Ford arrived right before the start of the T-Line.
So wait, and pardon me if I'm slow, but how much of that "20-25%" is due to the T itself opening? How much did Nat have to do with something that was already going to happen without him? That is, is it another pie-in-the-sky being painted by Mr. Ford to justify his suits and not-riding-MUNI lifestyle?
And "The N-Judah is torture" is a perfectly reasonable 'metric.' Why doesn't Nat himself tout these miniscule and invisible (yet immensely important) developments rather than saying the future is gunan be awsum? People actually ride these trains, you know.
Don't forget that Mr. Ford also gets a low interest loan for a nice home in town, and gets paid for the term of his contract regardless of what happens. If he somehow kicks butt and saves MUNI, he might not get rehired. Or he could bankrupt it and he'd still get paid.
When did working for the government get so lucrative? Between MUNI, the City, UC, and SF Unified, execs there do really really well!