would it be total conjecture to think by that time MUNI would have pulled its head out of its ass and actually have better service, e.g. like fast express service to & fro' downtown?
Well I know one thing that happened: The McAteer-Petris act, the "primary purpose of [which] is to promote responsible planning and regulation of San Francisco Bay. The Act emphasizes the elimination of the unnecessary placement of fill in the Bay, the use of the Bay for water-oriented uses."
Thank you en-vi-ro-MENTAL-ists for eliminating my Jetson's super jet future with your concerns about wetlands, sustainability and 'flood control'. I coulda had an atom powered lawn mower!
THAT is autocentric planning. look at the size of those man made islands along with the many linear conveyances (boulevards, bridges, etc.) Early to Mid-20th Century Americans considered rail travel to be quaint and outdated. The automobile, fueled by an endless supply of dirt cheap petroleum, would render the rails obsolete. It's one of the reasons we embraced the hideous modernist design mentality of morons like Le Corbusier that produced inhuman abortions like Cabrini Green in Chicago and the almost freeway right down the Panhandle. As usual, Europeans rejected the autocentric, but prolly because they kept blowing all their infrastructure up with silly wars, their cities were all so close together, and rail was (and is) a cheaper and more efficient means of transportation than roads. This means something when you're constantly rebuilding your country.
TAYM - Your point is taken, but I generally associate auto-centric design with highways, culs-de-sac and large plots of land, not a grid; I'll admit it appears challenging to get to the northern part of that claw without a vehicle (ferries, perhaps).
I understand that finding any excuse to bash him is something of an online pastime, but I guarantee you the vast majority of San Franciscans would hail Chris Daly as the greatest politician in the city's history if he had single-handedly prevented this enormous Sunset-penis from being (erm) erected. What a horrible, horrible idea this would be.
T.E. Lawrence on Day Around the Bay: Hey Brock, they took down the post with the Pepin interview...http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/shortorder/2009/11/editors_note_jacques_pepin_pos.php...
Check out the SuperSized Sunset! Can you imagine how long the L Taraval ride would be from the tip of that thing to downtown?
A bridge to Marin via Alcatraz and Angel Islands. Yesssssss.
@angrybat
would it be total conjecture to think by that time MUNI would have pulled its head out of its ass and actually have better service, e.g. like fast express service to & fro' downtown?
ok, nah, i'm dreaming.
Dubai at least gets artificial islands that look like palm trees ... why did we get a robot claw?
weed happend.
Well I know one thing that happened: The McAteer-Petris act, the "primary purpose of [which] is to promote responsible planning and regulation of San Francisco Bay. The Act emphasizes the elimination of the unnecessary placement of fill in the Bay, the use of the Bay for water-oriented uses."
Thank you en-vi-ro-MENTAL-ists for eliminating my Jetson's super jet future with your concerns about wetlands, sustainability and 'flood control'. I coulda had an atom powered lawn mower!
We're they trying to build the world's windiest, foggiest suburbs? Plus, I see no amusement parks. Where are the rides?
I don't like this future! The Mission is too damn foggy.
I do want that second bridge across the bay to Oakland airport though.
Then again I think we are all supposed to have flying cars so I guess we don't need airports.
Usage of LSD dropped off. That is what happened.
in the future, they call pages "paginas"
If you were to live around 85th Avenue and Ulloa, the San Andreas Fault would go right under your house.
FYI
Landfill + Faultline = :(
Doesn't the Golden Gate Tunnel make this all irrelevant anyway?
"Those in the know, go below."
i don't care if this plan displaces the entire east bay. i want it! so modern! and extra bridges? why can we have more bridges stemming from SF?
Hovercrafts are big in SFs future as well
And here we have someone building a giant pyramid over Alcatraz.
I guess the New York of the future is comfortable with nuclear power. (Someone should show this to McCain.)
Sprawl sucks.
Coasties don't care what you all do to the Bay. Just stay away from the beaches...
What happened is that there are two marine sanctuaries situated on those sites.
Besides, it looks like an Alan Smithy rendering, deplorable.
I love the horrific irony that the road to the northern huge-ass pincer landfill suburb-thing goes through notoriously outsider-friendly Bolinas.
Yeah, that'd go over well.
Boy, if you thought the avenues went on forever before ...
What happened? Mussolini was defeated. That set monumental architecture back 100 years, I tells ya.
@mcgordonliddy
> "Those in the know, go below."
Uhrm, that's what she said?
Modernism failed. Thankfully.
It's titled "San Francisco in 2050," so nothing happened. We're just not there yet. Be patient.
I love how the two square parks are so close to each other, yet there's no bridge between them, making them effectively miles apart.
pagina vagina
I'd say the automobile happened, paired with auto-centric planning, San Jose, Oakland.
Are those military, or civilian jets?
@zstone
THAT is autocentric planning. look at the size of those man made islands along with the many linear conveyances (boulevards, bridges, etc.) Early to Mid-20th Century Americans considered rail travel to be quaint and outdated. The automobile, fueled by an endless supply of dirt cheap petroleum, would render the rails obsolete. It's one of the reasons we embraced the hideous modernist design mentality of morons like Le Corbusier that produced inhuman abortions like Cabrini Green in Chicago and the almost freeway right down the Panhandle. As usual, Europeans rejected the autocentric, but prolly because they kept blowing all their infrastructure up with silly wars, their cities were all so close together, and rail was (and is) a cheaper and more efficient means of transportation than roads. This means something when you're constantly rebuilding your country.
You just know this would triple the net total of sushi joints in San Francisco.
In the future, planes fly ridiculously close to each other! How daring.
Daly happened
Interesting how the Cal campus has grown 2/3 of the way west to the Bay.
And those towers at the end of the each of the man-made peninsulas have to be part of some kind of weapon.
not a weapon, immigrant detectors.
TAYM - Your point is taken, but I generally associate auto-centric design with highways, culs-de-sac and large plots of land, not a grid; I'll admit it appears challenging to get to the northern part of that claw without a vehicle (ferries, perhaps).
It's not Modernism, it's Brutalism. The parks on the ends are the size of the Presidio, think how enormous the Phalluses of Capitalist Power would be.
If it's brutalism, where's the concrete?
That would ruin the surf at Ocean Beach. But I would forgive all if the plans included a subway to Hawaii.
Still no Marincello!
"Daly happened"
I understand that finding any excuse to bash him is something of an online pastime, but I guarantee you the vast majority of San Franciscans would hail Chris Daly as the greatest politician in the city's history if he had single-handedly prevented this enormous Sunset-penis from being (erm) erected. What a horrible, horrible idea this would be.
Thank god "the future" never turned out like this.
Here's to hoping it never will.
*clink*