Tom Vanderbilt, why have you forsaken us?
The author of the recently published Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (And What It Says About Us) is on the west coast at this very minute doing "lots of media" and guest-blogging for Powell's Books.
But NOT appearing in San Francisco.
As far as we know.
What, traffic not bad enough on Market St.?
880 moving too smoothly for you?
Guest-blogging for Modern Times not good enough for you? You have to go to Portland to talk about traffic?
I guess we'll have to make do with listening again to your appearance on Fresh Air and reading your blogs at Powell's and at www.howwedrive.com.
Our favorite Tom Vanderbilt blog moment: where you honor The Physics of Traffic, by Boris Kerner, with this unequivocal recommendation: "If you're going to buy only one physics of traffic book this year, this would be the one."
Our favorite Fresh Air moment: where that lady asks you about bicycle traffic in the Netherlands, and you reply: "It's a really interesting question, and it gets so complicated I really should write a bicycle sequel."
Shivers. No, really: shivers.
After the jump: Bay Area traffic isn't really that bad.

At least at 2:53 in the afternoon on a Monday.



Tom Vanderbilt, why have you forsaken us?
It's because we don't use articles in front of freeway numbers ("the 101") like the Philistines.
i actually heard his interview on Fresh Air, and found it to be one of the most boring ones the show's had recently. fwiw.
commenting again to plug one of my favorite traffic- and tranist-related blogs, which is never at all boring in comparison:
http://transbayblog.com/
transit. sorry.
For the slightly wonkier but still pop audience, there's a podcast on Vanderbilt's Traffic
on NPR's Science Friday.