<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: Workers Protest Chain of Taquerias Over Curious Labor Violations</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php</link>
<description>All comments for Workers Protest Chain of Taquerias Over Curious Labor Violations</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:53:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>sfperson2000</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1418572</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1418572</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:04:42 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I doubt the owner is doing anything wrong -- sounds like the Unions are in the wrong.  The benefit of a doubt is missplaced -- against the owner -- quite easy to do in  SF, especially when immigrant labor is involved.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Ciaran</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1417807</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1417807</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:00:53 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So unions can suck, of course.  But if they&apos;re breaking labor laws, close their asses down.

It&apos;s annoying that the moths are slowing everything down though.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ondrae</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1417731</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1417731</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:24:19 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So the union is trying to get the owner to follow the laws, and protect the rights of the employees?

I also believe the positive aspects of unionization - not having her tips stolen, being allowed to take breaks, paid sick days, and not having Maria&apos;s boss treat her in illegal ways - would drowned out any argument he could try to make about it hurting the amount of money that goes in his own pocket.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jacksevanroo</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1417707</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/07/24/workers_protest_chain_of_taquerias.php#comment-1417707</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:00:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This smells distinctly like union shennanigans. Who puts out a press release after they get fired? I know I didn&apos;t. This fine print here is that the union is trying to organize the employees of these taquerias, and they&apos;re running a smear campaign to get it done. The untold story: if the union agrees to drop the smear campaign, the store owner won&apos;t talk to the employees about the negative aspects of unionization -- monthly dues, possible strikes, crippling effect on business -- prior to a vote. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>