Et Tu, David?: Eggers Pens NYT Op-Ed Piece About SF Olympic Torch

In our continuing Beijing Olympic-boycotting coverage, Dave Eggers--the scribe ever well-educated San Franciscan loves to hate (because he's successful at what he does)--wrote a piece in this Sunday's New York Times about the Olympic Torch's run in San Francisco. He claims that the protests that will occur during the run will be a strong statement, especially since it's the torch's only run in Northern America and its an election year. China’s "complicity in the genocide in Darfur" and the Sudan are the focus of his article. Let's dive in, shall we?
My friend Valentino Achak Deng, a refugee from Sudan, just got back from southern Sudan last week where he was beginning construction on an educational complex in his hometown. He reports that along the southern border, there have been weekly clashes between the Sudanese Army and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, a rebel group that fought a long and protracted war with the government in the 1980s and ’90s.Hundreds have been killed, and a good portion of the residents of the south fear there will again be war. If this happens, it could make the conflict in Darfur look like a skirmish.
He ends by asking "[w]ill the demonstrators lining the parade route bring the topic back into the campaign and into the public consciousness? Is it audacious to hope?"
Boom. The end.
Since there's no commenting capability at the end of this op-ed piece on the NYT site, which we found a bit strange, we'll let readers answer here. So...is it "audacious to hope" that torch protesters will have an impact? Discuss.
