<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: No Torch For Chinatown</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php</link>
<description>All comments for No Torch For Chinatown</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:45:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Palo Alto Hippie</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319929</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319929</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:53:09 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Mayor Newsom is a cheerleader for corporate Hillary. What do you expect from corporate America? They love Chinese Communist dictatorship. A little ironic, no? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Belgand</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319586</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319586</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In all fairness designated smoking areas are specifically designed to put an activity that most find objectionable to be around (i.e. second-hand smoke) out-of-the-way. Being inconvenient does not diminish in any significant way your ability to smoke there.

&quot;Free speech zones&quot; are just a way to corral protesters to a place where they won&apos;t be able to effectively protest by both limiting the chance of anyone being able to see them and by penning them in to reduce their apparent numbers to a very small footprint.

In his defense I&apos;m willing to bet that Newsom really is right: people happy to see the torch will be in a very dominant majority. These are also the same people who voted him back into office by a landslide because they don&apos;t bother to read the news and somehow think he&apos;s been doing a great job. This isn&apos;t about appeasing the majority or even doing something that&apos;s going to get China to notice or care. It&apos;s about principles and making a symbolic statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Belgand</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319585</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319585</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In all fairness designated smoking areas are specifically designed to put an activity that most find objectionable to be around (i.e. second-hand smoke) out-of-the-way. Being inconvenient does not diminish in any significant way your ability to smoke there.

&quot;Free speech zones&quot; are just a way to corral protesters to a place where they won&apos;t be able to effectively protest by both limiting the chance of anyone being able to see them and by penning them in to reduce their apparent numbers to a very small footprint.

In his defense I&apos;m willing to bet that Newsom really is right: people happy to see the torch will be in a very dominant majority. These are also the same people who voted him back into office by a landslide because they don&apos;t bother to read the news and somehow think he&apos;s been doing a great job. This isn&apos;t about appeasing the majority or even doing something that&apos;s going to get China to notice or care. It&apos;s about principles and making a symbolic statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>christineb</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319517</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319517</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:24:18 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;LOL, free speech zones. Are those like the out-of-the-way, slightly hidden designated smoking areas in airports and theme parks? Let all the disagreeables linger there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jnice</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319399</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319399</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:06:08 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;darfur!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bluecanary</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319131</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/03/21/no_torch_for_ch.php#comment-1319131</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:24:51 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;and to all those who expressed disagreement when I&apos;ve been saying all along that Newsom is just a slightly more articulate Bush, I do my little &quot;toldja so&quot; dance.

&quot;free speech zone,&quot; indeed.  Because nothing affirms our freedom of speech like being herded into a cage like friggin cattle.

And I&apos;d love to see Newsom&apos;s little permit-granting process.  Perhaps he took the rules from Bull Connor&apos;s playbook.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>