<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: Why, Starbucks, Whhhhyyyyyy???</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php</link>
<description>All comments for Why, Starbucks, Whhhhyyyyyy???</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:45:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Arnaud H</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292751</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292751</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Their beans are not &quot;inferior&quot; - that is ridiculous. The issue with Starbucks quality comes from other things: for instance, the introduction in the 80s of the 5 lbs. bags. Peet&apos;s makes it a policy to brew coffee every 20 minutes and their beans have always been freshly roasted nearby. Starbucks can&apos;t afford that, so their coffee (and their beans) are not always as fresh. But their beans are not &quot;inferior&quot;. I&apos;m pretty sure I could organize a blind tasting of different coffees including Starbucks&apos; and the SBX haters who claim to be connaisseurs would not be able to recognize their most hated brew.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rroseselavy</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292741</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292741</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:30:40 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I applaud their efforts, but can&apos;t help but wonder why they don&apos;t care that the kiosk, bookstore, and airport Starbuckses will continue to serve rotgut.

Say what you will about the coffee, I have overall experienced pretty good customer service at Starbucks. Less surly than the indie breed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>mpantone</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292477</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292477</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Not likely. The problem starts with their beans. Go ahead, buy a pound of Starbucks coffee. From a Starbucks cafe or a grocery store, it doesn&apos;t matter. Take those beans home and brew up a batch. Several batches. Use an espresso machine, paper filter, French press, stovetop espresso maker, etc. 

It doesn&apos;t really matter how it&apos;s made, Starbucks coffee is inferior because the beans are inferior.

Let&apos;s face it. The Starbucks employees are being trained on how to mix grape Kool-Aid. Or maybe that&apos;s non-fat, soy-milk, decaf chai, venti Kool-Aid with cinnamon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>junk</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292421</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292421</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:40:05 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;it&apos;s not only their donuts-- it&apos;s their coffee.  check out their mega espresso machines. Their big, strong &amp; fast.  excellent for fast food service but bad for coffee. coffee ends up tasting burnt.  check it out...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Brock Keeling</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292326</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292326</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:28:35 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;why are their donuts so plastic-tasting? this concerns me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>xyz123</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292291</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292291</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:34:56 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;People of San Francisco go to Starbucks?  I don&apos;t work downtown so I wouldn&apos;t know.  Closest one to me is in a gas station at 9th and Folsom.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>generati</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292281</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/02/14/why_starbucks_w.php#comment-1292281</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:23:26 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Starbucks to begin Sinister Phase Two

That&apos;s the real reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>