<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: Statistically Insignificant Study Shows Caffeine/Miscarriage Correlation</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php</link>
<description>All comments for Statistically Insignificant Study Shows Caffeine/Miscarriage Correlation</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:45:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>cablecarsam</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275265</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275265</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:59:43 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Caffeine could cause a miscariiage in 2% of women who would already be highly likely yo have miscarriages because the smoke and drink too!
this is all BS
Everything in moderation.
Too much water kills too!
Who are these lame asses who do these studies everyday?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>zippy_monster</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275251</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275251</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:45:46 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;sucka, the study defines a risk not a guarantee that a pregnant woman using caffeine will miscarry.  Sheesh.

Did the study control for every single possible confounding variable?  I doubt it.  But if you read the Chron&apos;s oh so scary scientific mumbo jumbo you&apos;d have read that this study controled for many more factorys than previous research.

i think your diet, your genetics, your relative happiness/lack of stress have a hell of a lot more to do with these things than coffee.

Eh?  So what you drink is not part of your diet?  Oookay.

It&apos;s amusing how dependent you guys are upon your drugs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>manys</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275179</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275179</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In other news, an insurance and health provider has defined a common activity as exclusionary for coverage. Film at 11.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>aj</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275170</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275170</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:13:49 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think everyone should do the following about their health:

PANIC!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>suckafree</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275163</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275163</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:46:58 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i don&apos;t buy it zippy.  kaiser is not known for their research, in case you hadn&apos;t noticed.  show me an hmo that is.

besides, did they have all of these women living in labs under extreme scrutiny while they pre-screened them for every other single possible cause for a miscarriage?

my 105 pound wife had a cup or two a day and she was fine, as is our beautiful and healthy girl.

there are so many other things that affect these things that i don&apos;t think this is science.  it&apos;s statistical masturbation.  

see whatever you want from the numbers.

who paid for the study i wonder?

that usually tells you where the motive lies.

i think your diet, your genetics, your relative happiness/lack of stress have a hell of a lot more to do with these things than coffee.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jnice</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275085</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275085</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:12:47 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Excessive caffine intake also causes paranoia, aggressive behavior, defensiveness, and shrill, jittery hyperbole.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>zippy_monster</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275019</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1275019</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:18:17 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s important because the findings are quite legitimate.  It&apos;s statistically insignificant because it&apos;s just one study that has not been replicated yet.  It will become statistically significant if/when other &quot;small scale&quot; studies have been conducted and similar results concluded.

Previous studies on caffeine in pregnant women have been sorely lacking in internal validity (they didn&apos;t take into account lots of things that could have accounted for the results).  So, no, just because someone claims that THIS study is not statistically significant doesn&apos;t mean you should pooh pooh the research.  If anything it means you should be eager to see this study replicated.

What should be pooh poohed are people like you who misrepresent stuff. 1100 women is hardly a paltry sample.  Instead of spouting off utter nonsense, you should be looking at the research in question.  If their claims are absurdly broad and full of maybes, then, yeah more women should have been used.  Otherwise, they did just fine with 1100 women.

And 80% of miscarriages?  Oh, dear.  What are a few extra words between friends, right?  The good doctor said UP TO.  But you know, they&apos;re equivalent phrases, right?

Oh, I know looking at stuff objectively is just such a pain for ya Debbie, isn&apos;t?  Cause you&apos;re the ultimate authority, right?  Relax.  Have a smoke and a nice glass o cognac.  I hear that bush is looking for someone to help him interpret sigh-en-tiff-ick things.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>suckafree</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1274975</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1274975</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:25:21 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;don&apos;t believe the hype deborah.  you can still eat things like really good fish (ebisu, 9th/irving) just don&apos;t eat any wasabi, since it&apos;s a stimulant.

half glass of wine every day is fine too.

as for cooked fish, watch out for the predatory one&apos;s, older and larger that eat the smaller fish.  they are the only one&apos;s with mercury problems.  any good restaurant will know if you ask.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kimmie kim kim</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1274956</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1274956</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:05:50 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;where on earth did you find that coffee mug? it totally makes this entry extra special...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Leanne</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1274954</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2008/01/21/statistically_i.php#comment-1274954</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:01:16 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Good thing one shot of espresso is only 90 milligrams, which is less than a cup of coffee (120 mg). You deserve a latte today, Deborah!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
