About SFist

SFist is a website about San Francisco.

Editor: Brock Keeling
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archive | Contact | Job Board | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

Hit-and-run on 19th Ave. on Wednesday night! On Wednesday Aug 27th around 9:40pm a guy lo [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Blogroll
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from SFist.

December 17, 2007

Ask a Muni Driver

askdriver.jpgHave a rant against Muni? This week, our Muni Driver rants too, all in a response to a comment from last week. And remember, folks, if you got a question, send them to jon@sfist.com. We may not get to your question automatically, but we'll get to them as soon as we can.

And away we go.

{Disclaimer: I am not an official spokesperson for anything except my opinion as a MUNI driver, San Franciscan, and daily passenger just like the rest of you sorry sods relying on MUNI to get us to work on time. If you figure out who I am, please, please don't tell my bosses 'cause I want that pension some happy day - assuming there's any money left in the fund for the lowly drivers by that time.}

Why does the 71L change drivers at Van Ness at the height of rush hour?

Excellent question! But of course one I have no answer for...All I can do is commiserate with you on how utterly stupid this is. Not only is it stupid from the public's point of view, it's stupid from the driver's point of view. Using Van Ness as a relief point is idiotic because if your relief driver doesn't show up, you're forced to work at overtime.

This is because you have to drive the bus to the end of the line before returning to the barn, which takes about an hour. Or you're instructed to throw a whole busload of passengers off and go directly to the barn, thus taking the bus out of circulation at a critical time, meaning the bus following will be overwhelmed. If your relief driver is merely late, it's a huge problem because obviously it's not a location that makes any kind of sense for stopping and waiting. You end up snarling massive amounts of traffic - or at least making gridlock far worse than it has to be - and inconveniencing a full busload of passengers into the bargain.

The stupidity of the 71 hardly stops here, though. I've never been able to figure out why the 71 doesn't go all the way to the Ferry building at all times. On nights and weekends the route stops at 2nd Street, a totally unnecessary curtailment that confuses the hell out of everyone, especially passengers used to taking this bus during weekdays. This problem is more acute since the 7 Haight is no longer running. This means that if you come from the Haight Street corridor and want to go to the Ferry building, you have to transfer from the 71 to the F-Market or hoof it. Walking is fine unless you're disabled or elderly.

From the driver's point of view, another problem with this line change is that while there are MUNI bathrooms at the Ferry Building, there aren't any at the 2nd Street turnaround. I guess nighttime and weekend drivers just hold it all in???

I really think this is one of those mangled routes where public dismay/rage, if appropriately expressed, might make a difference. Passengers need to call and email MUNI to change the relief point from such a busy intersection and to force MUNI to allow the 71 to complete the route to the Ferry Building at all times. And while you're at it, maybe you could throw in a complaint about the lameness of the 48 Quintara having a staggered route where only every other bus stops at Kansas & 23rd, while the other one turns around at 3rd & 20th? We're always throwing at least fifteen passengers off the bus at Kansas who had no idea they weren't gonna make it all the way to the T-Train or CalTrain. Dumb, dumb, dumb!


Email This Entry







Advertisement: SFist Continues Below!

Comments (8)

hang on...when did the 7 cease to exist?!

 

The 7 runs rush hours only.

 

Thanks for making sense of the nonsensical 71.

To add to rider confusion, one of the signs for the 71 on Market doesn't correctly list the hours of service (I think it's at 2nd). I did file a complaint about this sign, but never heard back.

Last week, I noticed NextMuni wasn't even listing the 71L on their website. According to a Michael at NextMuni "There was a configuration problem. It has now been fixed."

 

Questions that came to me last week while riding MUNI:

Why do MUNI drivers not stop for ambulances with lights and sirens blaring?

Why do MUNI drivers try to run over little old ladies (okay, I almost enjoyed watching an eighty year old, eighty pound woman try to beat up a MUNI train with her cane)?

Why do MUNI drivers let the "customers" wait out in the cold for the duration of their cell phone break instead of letting them wait on the bus?

Why do MUNI drivers drive with their high beams on at night (you know, high beams, the ones that are designed to blind oncoming pedestrians and traffic)?

We're always throwing at least fifteen passengers off the bus at Kansas who had no idea they weren't gonna make it all the way

MUNI's kinda like that slutty prude you tried to fuck back in high school. If you drivers would bother to, you know, SET THE SIGNS PROPERLY so that we could look up and see "ooh this one says it's only going to Kansas & 23rd." No. Because you guys are too lazy to set the signs, people look at the sign and assume that the driver is just being lazy again. This is even better on the subway because the destination signs will "magically" correct itself after a few subway stops. How about a little bit more personal responsibility here bub?

 

Sure, signs would help, but the 48's weird switch-up just makes no sense.

Intersting that the driver's don't like this stuff either though.

 

As someone who grew up in the Sunset, I never could figure out what the 71L was limited to. Any clues how the route differs from the 71?

Been dying to know... for decades.

 

How does the 48 "switch-up" not make sense? MUNI pulls this with lots of other routes. The 14, 29, 38, J, L, and N come to mind. It seems fairly reasonable to me to not run a nearly empty bus all the way to the end of the line. If people are getting confused, the operator is simply not doing his/her job properly. Then again, if the operators and street supervisors did their jobs properly, a whole lot of things would be easier and less confusing.

At least with the buses, there's some sense of rhyme and reason (and in theory, if the operator is doing his/her job, you'd know before you got on the bus if it will reach your stop). With the N & L, they'd change the final destination as the train leaves the subway and bump a bunch more than fifteen people out on the street.

As for the 71L:

The master list is here:
http://www.sfmta.com/cms/asystem/routelist.php

If you click on route description (not one of the 511.org links), you land here:
http://www.sfmta.com/cms/asystem/routedesc.php?rted=71L

"Limited stop area between Haight & Masonic and Market & 11th/Van Ness with stops at Divisadero, Fillmore, Laguna and Gough/Franklin."

I don't know how accurate it is, as it still lists the 66 as running downtown(!) on occasion.

 

as someone who uses the 48 to get to work and school and everything I never had a problem with the switch up until I was in need of getting to the T line. i dont have a big problem with the switchup because it never seemed to affect me (wierd?) and i always caught the 20th and 3rd st bus. do you really dump that many passangers that often?

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.