About SFist

SFist is a website about San Francisco.

Editor: Brock Keeling
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archive | Contact | Job Board | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

Earthquake! [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Blogroll
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from SFist.

November 9, 2007

Political Junkie: How's That Election Count Going?

jnicholsonsback.jpgWe're baaaaaaack! We missed you!

Sorry we've been gone from the scene for so long -- yes, we've been swamped at work, but honestly, we've been so dispirited with this particular election cycle lately, we figured we were going to boycott posting until it was OVER. Over over over.

So -- man, how irritating is this? It's never going to be over! Thanks to the city's questionable ballot-reading machines, it's going to take weeks to finish the count. So we're lifting our self-imposed embargo early and reporting in on the status of the results.

The hard-working folks at the Dept. of Elections are releasing numbers as they get them, and here's where we're at:

--Overall stats: 30 precincts left to report in (about 5% to go, at least on the initiatives -- see note below re mayor's race status), and turnout so far is an anemic 16%.

--Mayoral race. Newsom: down from 75% in the absentees to 68%. Quintin Mecke is now in second with 8%. Chicken John at 2.25%, h. brown at .84% (552 votes). These are first-choice picks only, we think, and a sizable shift from the initial absentee count, where Hoogasian was in second and Pang in third. (Hoogasian is now in third, and Pang at fourth.)

Also, don't forget that the mayor's race is going to take longer to count because they've gotta count every single ballot that didn't vote for three candidates by hand, and not that many people ranked three separate choices, so it's slow going and these numbers are definitely likely to change. It looks like they're only about halfway through the mayoral ballots.

Along with the last 5% of the precincts, there's also still 25,000 absentees and 5000 provisionals to count. They're projecting to finish up by next week.

Ballot initiatives after the jump!

So did we mention we were really dispirited by the election cycle this go-around? Enough so that we didn't actually do any research at all on the ballot initiatives, and we free-balled it on election day. You know, it was kind of liberating! (Also, we spoiled a ballot -- those election day workers did not look pleased with us.)

So..... how's the initiatives going? Beats us, we didn't have any idea what we were actually voting for!

Well, the Yes on A/No on H folks are leading (but victory has not yet been declared on A. H is going down in flames). So more power to MUNI, and fewer parking lots in SF.

Mandatory Question Time (Prop E)-- still too close to call, but it's losing by 1.51% as of right now (51.51% to 48.49%.) That's close enough for a recount, isn't it? Question TIME! Question TIME!

Approval for Initiatives before putting them on the ballot (Prop C) -- Okay, we're going to incur the wrath of the progressives on this one, but we voted yes on this, because 1) we hate initiatives as a matter of principle, and 2) anything that encourages more confrontation between the mayor and Chris Daly is something that we are emphatically FOR! That'll shake us out of our recent non-posting local news bloggery malaise! Anyways, it won, they've called it for the Yes side.

Wifi (J): Getting someone in private industry to fund citywide wifi won. (it's non-binding, though.) Why don't we just start renting out the City Hall dome for advertisers now and get it over with?

Horses in Golden Gate Park (G): It won. Neigh!

Basically, everything got a yes vote, except for H (more parking lots). So that's library bonds, not letting people stay past 30 days if their commissioner position has expired, and a new small business office, among others. Police pensions (F) and Question Time (E) are the only ones that are really still up in the air.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: SFist Continues Below!

Comments (17)

Gavin wins? Oh yeah! The question is: now what? Will anything new happen? Time to roll out Gavin 2.0.

 

The Political Junkie is back!

Yaay!

 

Did Hillary Clinton win?

 

I worked this election and thought you'd get a kick out of how the eagle machines were acting up. The yellow ballot card had the mayor's race, the DA and the Sherif on it. The measures were on the purple card. All day long our machine rejected ONLY the yellow cards with the message that they had wrongly voted, even if they had correctly voted. And the message indicated that they had incorrectly voted ONLY on the mayor's race, not once did it return a message that the voter had mis-marked the DA or Sheriff races, and the purple measure ballots went through flawlessly.. We had over 7 techs in and out of the precinct all day long trying to fix it, with no luck. (that's another story) And this was the tabulator! Luckily this election the machines aren't tabulating the vote, just counting ballots. Not to worry, your vote will be fed through a high speed machine at city hall and surely that one will work properly. Cough. cough. And this was not only my machine. The dept. of elections said (on the phone while we were trying to get help) that this was happening all over the city. Hmm, the tabulator's consistently mis-counting the mayor's race. Gosh, I hope it didn't happen in any previous elections when the machine did tabulate votes! But I've worked with these machines for 3 years now and it's the same every year. That machine does not do what it's supposed to do and it probably never has. But it's very selective when it does f$#@ up.

 

Ok, now I figure the second and third choices have something to do with tracking voter response, whatever...

However, I don't want to vote for a second or third choice. It's an election, not a multiple choice test. Will "Chicken-whatever his name is" take over all responsibilities should Mr. America, oops, Gavin Newsome, not be able to complete his full reign?

Get rid of second and third choices on the ballot = faster counting time. Duh!

 

Thanks Rita. Saved me a phone call. So it's looking like an overall turnout of ~35-37%, with some significant no-shows for the candidate races.

The worst part about all of this is that my polling place moved and I had to walk three extra blocks. I was so not prepared for that.

 

I was also in charge of a polling place and batika's account is spot-on accurate. This election was dispiriting in more ways than one.

 

it's time to face facts - IRV is a tremendous waste of time, money, and needs to be scrapped. Remember how this was supposed to "save money" and "time?"

All those gimmicks and the progressives still got their clocks cleaned....poor them.

 

Progressives got their clocks cleaned? Uh, did you notice the counts on the two initiatives (A & H) that got any serious progressive attention?

 

It does save money and time. You think a run-off election would be easier?

 

So glad you're back, rita! We missed you!

 

The problem isn't ranked choice voting, which is just simple math. The problem is optical scanners that don't scan properly.

Think of it this way, Greg. In the absence of RCV we would have to have a runoff with still MORE hand counting. (Or we would have, if a serious opponent had run.) Then again, in the absence of RCV, Ron Dudum would be supervisor from D4, and Ed Jew would still be sipping bubble tea.

 

Oh yes, forgot to also say nice to see you again Rita!

 

batika: are you saying this was for something other than under-voting on the mayor's race?

I still think it's insanely stupid that there isn't a "no vote" option for the second and third choice. I considered marking write-in and not putting anything (or drawing a cock, if I could draw), but I wasn't sure if it that might make things even harder on counters.

 

pantsgolem - yes, every yellow ballot card was returned with a message from the machine. The problem was that the messages did not jibe with what was on the ballot. Ever. And remember there was RCV option for the DA and Sheriff too, and many people filled in all 3 with the same name, or one or none yet the machine did not give out ANY messages relating to voter choices for DA or Sheriff, yet was returned every time with a message that did not reflect the voters choices, and only for the mayor's race. Very weird. I hope that makes sense. However you look at it, it's strange and I'd say warrants investigation.

 

and don't draw anything at all on your ballot, however tempting, because your vote may not count. at least according to the machines.

Looking over my post above I see I got one sentence that's odd. I meant that all purple ballots went through without a message, all yellow ballots were returned with a message and only for the mayoral choice.

I wish I could draw a big fat doodoo on my ballot.

 

what do these results say to chris daly? i'm hoping it means the proverbial foot up his ass all the way to the hip bone. fucktard!

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.