<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: BREAKING NEWS: Some Disabled People Have Sex</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2007/10/30/performance_art.php</link>
<description>All comments for BREAKING NEWS: Some Disabled People Have Sex</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>sangfroid826</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2007/10/30/performance_art.php#comment-1227557</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2007/10/30/performance_art.php#comment-1227557</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:23 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I object to your objection on technical, (but not aesthetic) grounds.

A poetry reading in the course of public sex is clearly S&amp;M. Nipple clamps, poetry readings, scrotal torture play ... same ball of wax in my book. 

The only twist is that, in this instance, the exhibitionist takes pleasure in the agony of the voyeur.

See? Another tiny petal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>