http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php All comments for No, No Norteños en-us 2009 SFist_Brock Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:24 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss brochtrup@gmail.com brochtrup@gmail.com 60 http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1220819 http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1220819 Comments Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:04:37 -0800 <p>What?!? No more intimidating witnesses or graffiti? Seriously, do we need to make it more of a crime to commit crimes? As for the rest of the injunction, well, it's a good idea. While it really should be supplemented with programs to attack the root of the problem the idea of preventing gang members from associating is a valid one. The issue, as I see it, is one of the degree of evidence required to add someone to the list. The article doesn't really address this and it's a critical factor. Likewise, enforcement seems like an issue. Police now have to be notified of people on the list who aren't allowed to interact with other people on the list. It just seems like it could be problematic to try to enforce something at that personal of a level and will most likely merely be used if they're picked up due to other crimes to add onto their sentences.</p> http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1220010 http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1220010 Comments Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:57:41 -0800 <p>I hear the Surenos like San Diego-style burritos, while the Nortenos prefer the inferior Mission style.</p> http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1219951 http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1219951 Comments Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:15:14 -0800 <p>Oh now it's on!</p> http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1219948 http://sfist.com/2007/10/15/no_no_norteno.php#comment-1219948 Comments Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:13:32 -0800 <p>Red makes me look fat. Which is why I had no option, but to join the sartorially superior Sureños. Sur 13!! </p>