Quantcast

San Francisco Taxicabs vs. Limos

taxi-cab-sad-face-sedan-pedal-car-front.jpg
Cabbies are upset. Again. What's else is new? But:

This time the crankypants are concerned about limousines and towncars that illegally -- illegally? oh please -- pick up passengers at hotels, bars, clubs, or wherever to grab extra cash. Makes sense on the higher-end autos part. But as cabbies scrounge for customers -- or so we've often heard them complain -- they hate seeing other (and fancier) modes of transportation swipe passengers. According to Bay City News:

"Limo drivers have been stealing from us and gouging the public for years, but the problem has now reached epidemic proportions,'' Thomas George-Williams, chair of United Taxicab Workers, said in a prepared statement. "The city needs to get serious about enforcing the law because these thieves are costing taxi drivers and the public millions of dollars a year.''

Fine. But what with cab company blacklists, tempter tantrums over whispers of additional cars, lack of change for a $20 (that happens too many times for coincidence!), underwhelming availability of taxis at peak hours, and overwhelming fares, we would hate to see some inane punishment handed to limo/towncar drivers. (In fact, how would they enforce such a thing?) If SF had more taxis, and at a better price, United Taxicab Workers could start concerning themselves about the market that's just waiting out there for cabbies. They just need to take the time to build it.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@sfist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]