September 4, 2007
Peeping Tom Wants Smut Returned
In today's world of Xtube and the like, Dennis Saunders -- Healdsburg's very own convicted peeping Tom, whose stash was confiscated by the police -- now wants his pornographic material back. And as one commenter pointed out on SF Gate, "Who in their right mind will pay for porn this day and age?"
Really, who would nowadays?
And more to the point, who prefers videos and magazines to the clean and ease of blue footage found on l'Internet? Unless his collection holds some priceless and rare porn, why Saunders wants his library of over "700 videos [!] and 250 magazines" back is odd.
Or is it? Does anyone really prefer old-school XXX viewing anymore?
| Advertisement: SFist Continues Below!
Post a comment (Comment Policy)
From time to time, I still indulge in a good ol' porno mag. I suppose it takes me back to the innocence of my youth, when I used to steal copies of Hustler from Tower Records on Newbury Street in Boston.
In fact, I find that the feel of the glossy pages in my (left) hand is one of life's simple pleasures, a sumptuous enhancement of my masturbation experience.
Compared the usual flicking through 15-second clips while hunched over a 12" PowerBook, the heft of an actual magazine is a nice change of pace.
So pick one up the next time you're in a liquor store. You won't regret it.
Plus, they can show penetration these days.
#2, wow really? when did they start being allowed to show penetration?
/off to my friendly liquor store
//i'll be the guy toe tapping with a wide stance.
Well expressed, #'s 1 and 2.