<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: Dykes On Bikes Win Hair-Pulling Trademark Battle</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2007/07/19/dykes_on_bikes.php</link>
<description>All comments for Dykes On Bikes Win Hair-Pulling Trademark Battle</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Dan Berkes</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2007/07/19/dykes_on_bikes.php#comment-1151809</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2007/07/19/dykes_on_bikes.php#comment-1151809</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:04:11 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Funny, I&apos;ve never felt repressed during the march. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>periqueblend</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2007/07/19/dykes_on_bikes.php#comment-1151632</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2007/07/19/dykes_on_bikes.php#comment-1151632</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The best part of this story, as reported in the Sfgate, was the objections by one dude in particular  who was deeply, deeply, offended by the all things Dyke.

&quot;In the arguments he filed with the patent office and in court, he stated his opposition to any trademark for a group associated with the annual Dyke March, which he called &quot;the Annual Illegal San Francisco Dyke Hate Riot.&quot; 
He said he and all men are subject to criminal attacks and civil right violations during the march, and that the word dyke is associated with a &quot;deep obsessive hatred of men and the male gender.&quot; 

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/07/13/BAGR7QVVIP1.DTL
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
