About SFist

SFist is a website about San Francisco.

Editor: Brock Keeling
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archive | Contact | Job Board | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

I work in the presidio, and today we've been innundated with calls from people asking for "our op [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Blogroll
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from SFist.

June 20, 2007

Oh No, Ed Jew!: Juror

jury_box.jpgLook what we just got in the SFist editor's inbox!! Jury Duty with Ed Jew! This juror, being a good citizen, had to wait two days before the case resolved before being able to talk to us about it. We love you, juror reader!

By now, you’ve heard it reported that Ed Jew got called up for Jury Duty on Monday. Well, I was actually in his juror pool and got to see the whole thing go down! I was selected (he wasn’t. Something about residency, I guess?) so I have been unable to discuss it. But the parties settled yesterday, so the story of My Jury Duty With Ed Jew can now be told!

I started seeing him several times early Monday morning waiting his turn in the basement Juror Assembly Room at 400 McAllister. Every time I walked by him, I thought, "Haha! That guy totally looks like Ed Jew. Haha!" It’s kind of dark down in that basement area, and I had trouble distinguishing things. And why wouldn’t I? I had just smoked an enormous doobie walking from Civic Center to the Superior Court house.

But when we both got called up in the afternoon, to the bright lights and smaller quarters of an individual court room, it was unmistakable. Granted, he has gotten remarkably good at glancing back discouragingly at people who stare at him thinking, "Holy f***! Is that Ed Jew?" But I got in enough stares to know it was him. Hilariously, there was actually a moment at which the judge asked aloud, "Is anyone here not a resident of San Francisco?" Of course at that moment, Ed Jew doesn’t do or say s***.

And then the bomb that everyone in that court room who reads the papers or just loves his name is waiting for finally drops.

So what happened??? Click on the jump!

I'm already stuck in the juror box, and both attorneys have had their chance to dismiss. They didn’t dismiss me, but they did others, and the replacement names start getting called up.

"Jew, Edmond…"

It’s had to imagine that a painfully uncomfortable silence can break out in a room that has been pretty much silent for hours. Suddenly several sessions of whispering chatter start among the potential jurors, and there has been no whispering chatter at anyone else’s name before now I can assure you. The judge has the wide-eyed "Holy f***! That is Ed Jew!" moment that most of us jurors have already had, but she plays it off well with a generic "Hi" and a smile to him.

The case is a civil trial involving -- wait, what do you care? You just want more Ed Jew!

He is now in the jury box, and several of us are quietly going nuts over the prospect we could actually be on a jury with Ed Jew at the height of the Ed Jew scandal. The judge will not have it. She pulls both attorneys out of the room and excuses herself as well, leaving Ed Jew to put on a clinic in squirming uncomfortably in his chair, visibly, in the juror box. They all reappear within two minutes, and the judge calls Ed Jew up to her bench individually. Keep in mind that thus far, she has been a major hardass about excusing anyone.

So there’s Ed Jew and the judge, whispering to each other at the bench, both working really hard to maintain diplomatic smiles. It is clearly something of a nightmare situation for both of them. The only thing we can make out is when she says "Thank you." And he bolts right the f*** out of the room, without even getting his Juror Badge number checked off. Which you are supposed to do.

Some other sap got called up in his place, and that’s the story of my jury duty with Ed Jew.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: SFist Continues Below!

Comments (13)

I love it. This is great. Thanks.......

 

Wait a minute, how do we (or SFist) know any of this is true? I'm all for more fact-based Ed Jew fun -- and I'm sure the supply is nowhere near drained yet -- but for all I can tell, this is mostly BS constructed around a few previously published facts. If SFist has done anything to verify the story or even the premise that the sender really was on jury duty when he/she says he was, please let us know. Without that information, I've got no reason to pay attention.

 

Now I know why I'm always excused from jury duty....I'm never high enough. Next time I'm called, doobies will be smoked!

 

I'm in the pool this week as well, just haven't been called in yet. I flipped out when I found out I was almost in with Ed Jew.

 

I see no reason to doubt that this story IS true.

If you've ever served on jury down at Superior Court, you'll know there's hundreds of people sitting around waiting in the basement. When called, courtrooms usually pull up at least 50 people at a time.

 

This is someone's personal account. Should we force them to undergo a lie detector test? Maybe we should try to get a hold of the court reporter! Sheesh.

 

Michael, I think you're right that the *feel* of the account is spot on. It is. But that doesn't mean that this particular account is true. It may only mean that the writer had been called to jury duty before. I could write a similar account of Hasselhoff's custody proceedings, but that doesn't mean I was really there. I do cook a mean cheeseburger, though, as the Hoff will attest if he's not too loaded.

Deborah, no -- no lie-detector test is needed (it wouldn't be very good evidence in any case). But should it be published if SFist has no clue if it's for real or not? If this account is supposed to be factual reporting, then I as a reader expect either that SFist will present better information to support it, or that they'll hold back from publishing it.

If you're going to be skeptical about the stuff you see on "old media" then you've got to be skeptical about stuff published here, too. "How do you know that?" remains a valid question.

 

Hey, SFist community... I'm the "anonymous" guy who sent this tip in. I'd give you my juror badge number, but then they'd totally know I took weed to court.

Regrettably, I actually had to serve on this jury whereas Ed Jew was immediately dismissed. Most prospective jurors were not called on and dismissed Monday afternoon, thereby they could immediately begin reporting information to Matier & Ross, etc. I specifically asked the judge's assistant (not the Recorder, but the individual who does the oath) if as a juror I could mention this to anyone, and he asked that I did not until the trial was over. This pretty much snuffed my ability to provide anything not already reported. Goodbye, book deal.

I could provide information on the specific case before the court, because he was assigned to a pool for a specific case. But I think that would be unnecessary and maybe unethical.

There is, however, one detail I've provided that I think is unique and has not appeared elsewhere: He was addressed as "Jew, Edmond". Dudes I am totally obsessed with the Ed Jew saga and read everything I can on it, but I have never seen him referred to as "Edmond." I always assumed "It's 'Edwin', because he's Cantonese."

Sorry people. But I really thought that. And I would not have known that it was "Edmond" (could be "Edmund" I suppose) if I had not been there.

Thanks so much SFist Rita for posting this and to all you guys for looking at it! Let it rip, these comments delight me.

 

Chester?

 

And I should say DJTennessee offered me a phone number for confirmation of the story, but I figured the story wasn't such that we needed to see, like, a certificate of service from the jury commissioner or anything like that.

When SFist confirms something we get from a third-party source, we tend to indicate that we've confirmed it -- we didn't confirm the story about 911 from the inbox yesterday either.

Guy Who Keeps Pointing Stuff Out makes a good point that you should always read everything on this site as critically and skeptically as you read anything else! We try to be as transparent as possible but are always happy to clarify as needed.

 

DJ Tennessee sounds hot.

 

I totally believed you, anyway, DJTennessee. Thanks for sharing your Jury Duty story! I hate jury duty (and I am called to both courts frequently) but this, damn... this is a GEM!

 

Hey, cool! A serious issue taken seriously! The cockles of my shriveled, cranky wonkish heart are warmed. Thanks, rita and DJTennessee. I should say, though, that although my impression now is that it's much more likely the account is real than fake, I wish the question of how people know what they claim they know were applied more frequently to newsy posts here.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. We use MovableType.