Ask a Muni Security Guy

Police_Man1.gifToday, our Security Guy would like to start off by alerting everyone to the fact that the Proof of Payment rules are actually online. You can check them out here and here.

Then there's last week's story about Aaron Peskin trying to propose new rules to make paying Muni fines easier then we guess the process is now (as we've never been fined-- we once hopped off the N before a fare inspector could get us-- we don't know how hard it is now).

Now, back to the feature. For this week, we are once again going to post the Security Guy's answers to questions asked by our commentors. Since there were so many last week (and thank you, dear readers, for asking so many interesting questions in the comments), we're going to run this as a two-parter. One will come today, another tomorrow.

So, after the fold, we have the first part.

My understanding was that the cameras in the vehicle were "rotated" after so many hours, basically recording in a loop. If there is a crime on a bus, it needs to be taken out ASAP before the tape loops. Perhaps this is the question for the security guy? Thanks for answering my question, by the way, politics shouldn't come before safety.

most cameras are on hard drives. the HD's are rotated every so often. only when incidents become to our attention will the HD's be pulled sooner and the contents reveiwed. again, only so many vehicles have the HD's / "tapes."

First, thanks for answering my first question. Second, I think its really important for San Francisco to realize that we brought much of this upon ourselves. Back in the day (as I am told by my parents) MUNI implemented a strategy to cut commuter times by encouraging boarding in the rear. Now, we talk aboutit like its the anti-christ. I go to school in New York, and in all the times ive taken the busses (which is pretty often) I haven't seen a single person board from the rear.

I dont know how MUNI is going to pull out of the culture its created of rear door boarding. I know that there are cultures though, ones made of all sorts of people like new york, that PAY for their public transit.


agreed, MUNI brought this upon themselve with the back door boarding to get people on.

"They are enforced by the information provided by the individual. The courts determine if the citation was answered by the cited individual or otherwise taken care of. The courts themselves issue the fines - generally very low. fare evasion citations are not taken very seriously by the courts. There is a process in the works that fare evasion citations will be handled through the DPT Hearing Officer in the future.

Oh my god, what BULL! I'm sorry dude, I don't mean to take this out on you personally but either you are the most ignorant fare inspector ever or you're paid to LIE THROUGH YOUR TEETH. I got nailed my first week in SF - I gave him my right info, he completed avoided the question of "how much?" by saying he didn't know. The ticket? $150 (at the time) - One thousand times the price of a fare. Do not tell me that this is "low." The only reason you don't tell people when they ask you is you know you'll get your ass kicked. I'm just saying - be honest.

the next step (in the process) would be to receive a statement from the courts regarding the "fine". It's 115.97 (not including court assessements - sp?). If this person contested the citation through court, he/she would probably have paid 10.00 to 30.00 for a first time "offender."

if he just received and read the notice THEN mailed in his check...

fare inspectors will "never" tell anyone what the fine amount is. Same as if you get pulled over by the police for running a stop sign. we never know what / when the court may change things - hence, fare inspectors do not "quote" fine amounts.

Proof of Payment is based on a "honor" system. Those to get caught, remain there and give their information - kudos to you, yes you will get notified of a fine and be expected to pay or contest the citation.

Conversely, There are many others who just walk or run away. fare inspectors do not have the authority to 1) verify your statements and 2) to physically stop and detain you. This is the "pitfall" in the fare inspection program. Those to wish to cheat and "beat" the system - DO. (unless a SFPD officer is there, then good luck because they can physically stop you).

Citation / Court System:

Get a citation
receive a notice in the mail on the fine or contest
if you pay the fine - that's the end.

if you contest it....
the fare inspectors receives a notice to write a written report, which goes back
to the court
the contester comes to court and reviews the report and may enter a plea
OR further contest the citation which...
a subpoena will be issued to the fare inspector for an in person appearance
at that hearing, the contester may give his/her side to the story and
question the fare inspector further
the court will eihter dismiss the citation or issue a fine - this is when it's usually
between 10.00 to 30.00 for a first timer, 20 to 40 for a second and 50 to 75 for
a third time violator and on...

IF the fare inspector does not show up to court in person as subpoenaed, the case
is dismissed automatically.

Effective July 2007, this process will be taken over by the DPT Hearing Office. The
only real change is the fine amounts - MORE. 1st timer 25.00, 2nd timer 50 to 75.
third timer 75 on up to the full amount - 115.97. (still in the finalization stages,
not set in stone just yet).

Email This Entry


Comments (3) [rss]

So you can just give them a fake name? And you don't have to show them ID?

So if I get stopped and don't have PoP, I can quote my name as SFist Jon, and he'll get my ticket, and there's nothing the inspector can do?

Or, I can be Danny Glover, and the guy will have to believe me?

Can I refuse to answer?

I also jumped off an J but they tired to block the door yelling "Don't touch me!"

You can refuse to answer them and you DONT need to show them ID. BUT they will call the cops who might or might not come. They can't detain you.

I got away.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About SFist

SFist is a website about San Francisco.

Editor: Brock Keeling
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

John Burris wants to be a vexatious litigator: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from SFist.

All Our RSS