Welcome to the Machines

_39912092_dalek_bbc.jpgThose electronic voting machines everybody loves could be coming to a voting place near you as San Francisco is looking into signing a $12.6 million four-year contract with Sequoia Voting Systems Inc. The proposed contract would give us 610 optical scan voting machines (machines that read a paper ballot) and 610 touch-screen voter machine for the disabled.

But before we sign anything, the city is asking Sequioa systems, the makers of the machines, two things. One is a paper trail, something that has been a large source of controversy because up until this point, there wasn't any. This meant that when things get screwed up, as they have, there's a way of tracking things or at least figuring out what the real vote count was. The other is some information on the software. This is another issue because nobody really knows how those suckers work. If they're said to be easily hackable and not very secure, it's good to know how the things works to see what could possibly go wrong. Especially since nobody trusts those things anyways.

Yesterday, a hearing of the Budget and Finance Committee was held to discuss the proposed contract. It was hoped that a decision would be made one way or the other about the machines but no decision was made. The reason is because after attempts by the Board of Supes (mainly Chris Daly and Tom Ammiano) to get Sequoia to give up the goods about their software, Sequoia refused to give it up. No software, no dice. So we're back to where we were before.

If the deal isn't completed with Sequoia, election director John Arntz says he might have to go buy more expensive, not quite so up-to-date voting machines elsewhere.

Email This Entry


Comments (3) [rss]

A few of corrections, about the post:


  • The "paper trail" is not a point of disagreement with Sequoia, and there are no plans to buy any paperless machines. The touch-screen machines are only for assistance with marking paper ballots, which are then counted (and are re-countable) like any other paper ballot.
  • If the deal with Sequoia does not go forward, no new machines will be purchased--the City would simply continue to use the machines that they already have.

and the story:
  • The Sequoia contract would not be more economical than using existing machines

  • Disclosing their source could would not compromise the security of the machines, here or anywhere else--it would enhance it.


A better article from The Chronicle is available here: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/22/BAGFMO8UDR1.DTL

For more information, see the Open Voting Consortium:
http://openvoting.org/

I don't get it, Derek. Why are we buying the machines in the first place? It seems like the existing scanners work fine.

Actually, Derek, the touch screen model being purchased (called the AVC Edge II Plus) does not assist the disabled by marking a paper ballot. The machines primarily store the votes electronically. There is a paper audit trail (VVPAT) that the voter is supposed to check in a plastic window. But few voters do this or even know about it. Also, I'm not sure if the paper trail will be used during the audit.

This is different from the current ES&S AutoMARK machines for the disabled which do mark a paper ballot. We bought the AutoMARKs only about a year ago, and already they are being replaced? Makes no sense...

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About SFist

SFist is a website about San Francisco.

Editor: Brock Keeling
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Elihu Hernandez is running for Board of Supervisors in District 6 and he is having his campaign kick
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from SFist.

All Our RSS