SFist Interviews: District 8 Candidate Alix Rosenthal

alixhovers.png
When the Party-Party folks started agitating to Dump Dufty, we couldn't wait to see who'd step up to the plate. Who would dare run against a celebrated gay man in the gayest gay district of a city populated entirely by gay homosexual gays? Alix Rosenthal (pictured at right, hovering majestically above the treetops), that's who. Bevan, can you hover majestically? We didn't think so.

Alix is an attorney and civil servant, known for her love of burning man, her advocacy for SF's handgun ban, and for being of a generally lefty-artsy disposition. And with BeyondChron pointing out that Bevan's voting record has aligned chiefly with the conservative Supes, the D8 race has turned into a sort of battle of personalities -- Bevan's always been a fun guy, but Alix has wacky fundraisers that are wacky! She's pro-partying! Whee!

So, Alix: What was it that made you decide to run?

I decided to run because I have been watching San Francisco lose its artists, families and middle class, and City Hall isn’t doing enough to keep housing affordable. MUNI service is in decline - it needs to be faster and more reliable. I am also running because a global environmental crisis is looming - city government needs to start taking bold steps to fight global warming. I was propelled into the race after Bevan voted against two pieces of solid environmental legislation earlier this year.

Bevan is focused on responding to citizen complaints – and solving problems one at a time after they occur. District 8 deserves leadership that solves and prevents problems hundreds at a time, with creative, broad-based solutions.

If you're elected, what are some specific ways in which your constituents’ lives will be different after one year of your leadership? After two years? After four?

In my first year, I will work hard to reinvigorate the City’s solar roofs initiative – the City will do more to help homeowners switch to solar power. With my vote, the Board will approve Jake McGoldrick’s Healthy Saturdays legislation to open portions of Golden Gate Park to bicyclists, rollerskaters and pedestrians on Saturdays. I will also vote to expand police foot patrols to District 8.

In the first few years of my term, I plan to bring City leaders together to develop a comprehensive violence prevention plan, including community policing and funding for more community-based programs. With my leadership, the City will provide incentives for the development of new rental housing.

By the end of my term, MUNI will be substantially improved because I will have worked to find and dedicate the funding necessary to get MUNI back on track. The Citywide Bike Network will be completed, and the City will be safer for bicyclists and pedestrians.

Let's say someone just moved to San Francisco and doesn't know anything about the city -- how would you sell them on moving to your district?

No matter who you are, you can find a neighborhood in District 8 that suits you. District 8 has several vibrant commercial districts, including the Valencia corridor, 24th Street in Noe Valley, the village of Glen Park, and the fabulous Castro district. It has some of the best parks of any district, including many playgrounds and dog runs, nature trails, tennis courts and athletic fields. And since it is in the heart of the City, it is easy to get anywhere you want to go.

What's something about your district that you hope never changes?

I hope the Castro stays the predominantly gay neighborhood that it is. I see the Castro changing, as it becomes less tolerant of renters and our LGBTQ homeless youth. I will work hard to protect the Castro’s character, with projects like gay-themed historical markers, entertainment venues and public art, and by preserving affordable housing in the neighborhood.

Let's say you win. Would you work with the losing candidates so that the district could benefit from the contributions that they could make?

Bevan has worked in city government for ten years, and has a vast knowledge of the city’s bureaucracy. In the first year of my term, I would like to call on his expertise for specific neighborhood issues that I know he has worked on. I’d like to involve Starchild in the sex worker issues that are coming before the Board in the coming year, specifically regarding legislation written by the Commission on the Status of Women that would ban private rooms in strip clubs.

Let's say you lose. How would you go about working with the winner to affect the sort of change that you want to see?

I’ve been delighted to see that we have already affected the way that Bevan has approached his own campaign. In the last several months, he has changed his positions on tenant issues, affordable housing, the environment and public safety in response criticism from the left. If Bevan wins reelection, I pledge to pressure Bevan to be a more progressive vote on the Board, and I plan to be a vocal advocate for the issues that I’m running on.

Regarding the environment: your advocacy of "Living Roofs" -- that is, rooftop gardens -- is really interesting, but won't it take a lot of work to adapt rooftops, and to get homeowners on board, and to teach people how to make it work? How would you implement that sort of a program without the effort outweighing the benefit?

The most common living roofs are not complicated rooftop gardens, but a single layer of dirt and plants over a waterproof material and a drainage system. They can require relatively little effort to install and maintain. Chicago, Toronto, Portland, and many cities in Europe have successful green roof initiatives in place that San Francisco could model. Rather than starting with private homeowners, SF should demonstrate the feasibility of living roofs by starting with public buildings, just as Chicago did – by installing 20,000 square feet of green roof on its City Hall. Chicago also has a grants program in place to incentivize the installation of living roofs on private buildings.

The economic, ecological, and aesthetic benefits of green roofs are enormous. They can help the owner save on heating and cooling costs, and they can help reverse global warming. Green roofs can improve our air quality and our water quality by reducing the amount of pollution delivered to the Bay. Green roofs are the next big thing in environmental city planning – I look forward to working on this issue once elected.

What are the first five changes would you implement to try to fix Muni? Have you read SPUR's reports on Muni's budget shortfall? What are your thoughts on the methods they propose for increasing ridership and revenue?

I read SPUR’s report called “MUNI’s Billion Dollar Problem” before writing my transportation policy. I support its recommendations, and I look forward to implementing them after I’m elected. SPUR is right – MUNI will continue to spiral downward until we dedicate the funds necessary to get it back on track. I am supporting the parking tax measure on the ballot this fall, and if it passes, the City must dedicate all of its revenues to improving MUNI.

I would want to see lower bus floors and a smartcard program to speed up the boarding process. I’d like to install transponders in every bus that will keep traffic lights green when buses approach, so as to get them through traffic faster. Transit-only lanes also make buses faster by removing them from traffic – we should build more of these, and better enforce the ones already in place. I’m looking forward to learning the results of the Controller’s Transit Efficiency Study and implementing its recommendations to make MUNI’s routes more efficient.

You've said that you want to develop a citywide violence prevention plan. What are some components that you think should be in such a plan? If it was up to you, would you have changed anything about Prop A, the homicide-prevention measure that voters recently rejected?

I supported Prop A, and I was very disappointed that it narrowly missed passing in June. I would like to bring similar community-based violence prevention programs to the Board for approval if I’m elected. I find it interesting that the Mayor – who opposed Prop A – is now promoting community-based violence prevention measures now that the homicide rate is climbing to new levels. The only thing I would have changed about Prop A is the election that we chose to present it to voters. Placing it on the November ballot may have resulted in a win, since November elections generally have higher turnouts.

Combating graffiti is high enough on Gavin's radar that he's offered a bounty for BNE. How would you combat vandalism in district 8?

I love the BNE story! Seriously, with our murder rate at an all-time high, with violent crime on the rise citywide, and with a police department that has limited resources and that is embattled over discrimination problems, graffiti is hardly the biggest crime issue in the City. I was surprised to see the Mayor staking his political future on it.

It is very difficult to catch taggers because they act so quickly. However, I would support the idea of a reward system wherein citizens who report taggers and litter law violations are awarded a part of the monetary penalty imposed on the violators after they are caught.

You advocate programs such as community land trusts and cooperative housing -- programs in which the residents share control of their building -- as methods for attracting middle-class residents who can't afford to buy a whole house. For which people would these programs work best? Is there anyone for whom they're not such a great deal? It sounds like these programs have fewer advantages than outright home ownership; how would you encourage people to pursue housing that may carry more financial risk?

CLTs and limited-equity coops aren’t for everyone. They are primarily designed for folks for whom traditional homeownership is not a realistic option; those who want the security of homeownership, but need assistance with the down payment. That being said, CLTs and coops usually carry less – not more – financial risk, which is why this form of homeownership results in less financial reward on the back end. CLTs and limited-equity coops are not for folks who are able to come up with their own down payment to purchase their home, or real estate speculators.

It looks like the Castro is poised on a small construction boom, particularly in lots that for the last few years have held low-density buildings, gas stations, or nothing at all. What sort of planning and zoning would you like to see happen in those areas?

I would like to ensure that the new developments in the Castro are context-appropriate, so that they fit in with the surrounding blocks, and don’t adversely affect the appearance of the neighborhood. Several empty lots along Market are ripe for infill development, particularly since Market is a transit corridor. I would like to make sure that the developers provide adequate community benefits in exchange for the right to develop, including parking and traffic mitigations, with a high ask for open space and inclusionary housing. I would also insist that the new development includes office, studio and performance space for community-based nonprofits and arts organizations.

How would you work with property owners to make your vision a reality?

As a homeowner and real estate owner, I know that when it comes to regulating property, certainty is key. It is important that city government refrain from changing the rules without providing ample notice. With my background in real estate, I am confident that I will be able to bring property owners, city planners and neighbors to a fair agreement.

What's your favorite place in the city outside of your district? Fort Funston


And now, of course, the SFist getting-to-know yous:

Favorite place to spend time online (website/blog/RSS feeds): Besides SFist? www.sfusualsuspects.com

Favorite local business: Yoga Flow

What I'm currently reading: the Glen Park Community Plan, and all of the local news sources. After November 7, I look forward to finishing Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell.

Best Deal in San Francisco: the Tamale Lady

Favorite mode of transportation/favorite MUNI line: My favorite modes of transportation are my scooter, my bicycle, and BART.

Best Band or Musician to come out of the Bay Area: Carlos Santana

Favorite Bay Area Stereotype, and whether or not you buy into it: That we live in a bubble. It’s not true – it is the rest of the US that’s in a bubble, out of touch with the rest of the world.

Favorite local hangout: Café Flore

SF has the best...underground dance scene

You've never lived in SF until you've...been to the Folsom Street Fair.

Favorite Bay area politician of past or present: Harvey Milk

Now that Mayor Gavin is single, who are you going to set him up with? I would like to see him date a woman who is his equal.

You can tell someone is a local here if... they are happy with the effects of global warming.

SF would be soooo much better if only...we dedicated more funding to public art.

Best Burrito: Taqueria Zapata at 18th and Castro.

Any questions you'd ask if you were doing this interview? Did Steven T. Jones edit your responses?

Email This Entry


Comments (20) [rss]

I dont care if she promises me a check for $500 - she lost me a long time ago with all that "keep SF freaky" nonsense.

...San Francisco lose its artists...

Seriously, this city has enough second rate artists. I think we could afford to lose a few. Can I trade some for a rooftop garden?

I'm a dist. 8 resident. I'll be voting for Alix. I'd rather have someone with a few solid ideas in addition to her pie-in-the-sky stuff instead of a static bureaucrat with neither of the above.

Alix shows up in the neighborhood. She talks to people at the Noe Farmers' Market. She's polite, and open to feedback.

I've never seen Dufty in person, only his uninterested lackeys behind campaign tables in the 'hood that don't bother to talk to me, even when I look them straight in the eye.

I think it's indicative of something.

bobD- I'd be interested to know what attracted you to San Francisco. By many peoples' accounts, SF is attractive because of it's diversity and deviation from the mainstream. Coupled, of course, with amazing natural beauty. "Only in San Francisco" said in a tone of mild shock but certainly colored by a big dose of wonderment is a common refrain. In the hallowed confines of a museum, openness to new ideas and willing to take risks is called "creative". Outside on the sidewalk, not yet safe, one could easily label the same as "freaky".

Ciaran - spend some time with artists and slip in the notion that a community of third, second and first rate artists be trimmed of the "bottom" performers. See how quickly the entire community exits stage left. Do you honestly think that truly brilliant artists want to live in a community where everyone around them is just ready to consume their art? Or do you suppose they feed off the energy of other creatives around them?

Is SF really in any danger of a significant exodus of artists?

In reality, SF probably is not going to see a net decline in the number of artists. It's just that most will not be Masters of Fine Arts, but rather Masters of Financial Arts.

To commenter Adam: for those of us who have lived in SF for a long time, the natural beauty part takes a back seat to real world problems such as third world like potholed streets, messy sidewalks, an embarrassing percentage of unsolved capital crimes, a public transit system in disarray etc.

So we need city leaders who can solve these problems rather than trying to bring the Olympics (jeez!), wring their hands over Muni, the Police or the Fire department or pursue their personal agendas.

Can't we think of a better adjective than "vibrant" after all this time?

You should of asked ALix how well she knows district 8 and if she plans to ride muni when she becomes supervisor .. if she is running for district 8 dont you think she should be riding it now?

I'm going single-issue on Dufty. His vote against Healthy Saturdays showed that he has no brain.

I think Bevan would make an outstanding D2 Supervisor. Or D4, perhaps. I don't think you have to restrict yourself to a single issue, look at the bare facts of his voting record, he is not in line with his district. Even if you saw the BeyondChron editorial, you may still have missed the PDF analysis. Take a look and then talk more about Dufty and his "all about the neighborhood" campaign motto.

the park is already closed on sundays so why is the entire weekend necessary? maybe we need to put the vote to the people! oh yeah, the people already voted down the idea back in 2000. maybe bevan is actually in touch with the voters. and how about this quote from ms. rosenthal "The Castro is becoming more and more straight every year, with all the condo conversions, and we have to be very careful about who we’re becoming." uh, is this an example of her progressive values? does she also think only hispanics should reside in the mission and italians in north beach. and her half baked ideas about affordable housing CLTs & COOPs...yeah, that may fly up at burning man but not in noe valley.

To KWillets,

What was your reason for supporting the saturday closure? I'm not going to try and talk you out voting based on this one issue, but I would like you to have some additional information was not brought up (I tried! I wrote several during the saturday closure debate.

Unfortunately the injunction that fell out of the saturday closure attempt has derailed this for the moment, but there was a plan that had been in the works for several years which Bevan Dufty and the Bike Coalition were part of.

The plan is to remove 200+ parking spaces, narrow the car lanes on JFK to add striped bike lanes and a median. The pedestrian path was to be widened. The corners would be rebuilt with those ADA ramps, possibly extended out like the corners in Duboce Triangle which reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians and force cars to slow down as they go through.

I wouldn't think twice about choosing a saturday closure or this plan which would make a permanent improvement to the park, especially the cyclists who commute along JFK who wouldn't have received any benefit.

For me it was a simple matter of comparing park usage on the two weekend days. Sunday pedestrian/bike traffic on JFK is nearly twice as much as Saturday's.

We also have two children, and outdoor areas for them to ride are rare in the city.

I have to take issue with Alix Rosenthal's comments about Muni. Yes, Muni sucks much of the time and needs a lot of help which is why I was appointed as a commissioner by the Mayor on Bevan's recommendation to the MTA's Citizen Advisory Council. (The MTA runs Muni and the DPT)

That puts me in a position to know more than most about what's going on behind the scenes to improve service and the projects that are on the way. Nothing Alix said in this interview, or on her web site is wrong per se, actually these are good improvements. My problem is she is talking about improvements that are all going to happen in the next year, in fact some are already happening.

- Low-floor buses, and diesel-electric hybrids as a bonus are already in testing. They will replace the oldest and dirtiest of our busses next year.

- Light tripping transponders on the busses aren't a problem, it is the intersection lights and computers that need to be replaced to work with the busses.

Side note: In many cases this would be a waste of money when all we need is to better time the lights. A light was retimed along the J-Church recently and has reduced delays by several minutes. Here's what happens a lot of the time. A bus might take an average of 64-68 seconds to board at a stop, but that light is green for only 60 seconds. The bus will be caught for another 52-56 seconds waiting. Now repeat that over the entire course of the line and it adds up.

- Two dedicated bus lane projects are currently in the works for Van Ness and Geary. The Octavia Plan includes a bit about dedicated Muni lanes along Church for several blocks. Potrero is in the early stages and the Planning Department just recently published a study on turning Folsom into a boulevard with dedicated lanes

- The Translink smart card has been a long time coming, but nearly everything has been worked out it is about to launch. You have probably seen the Translink machines that have been installed in the downtown stations.

It's a bit like the stored value cards BART uses, these more durable like credit cards, payable with cash and credit card (auto-billing with be available. It can be a combination of both your fast pass and some extra cash for other trips. If you were to take a trip on BART from Glen Park to the east bay, it will notice that if you have it credited with a FastPass and only start charging for BART from the stored cash value when you leave Embarcadero station.

What Alix did not bring up...

- The tunnel's computer control system is all fubar and causes those weekly, sometimes almost daily shutdowns. The tunnel had better on-time performance before it was installed.

- About a third of the Muni Metro cars (151 total) are busted right now. There are supposed to be around 95 cars running for weekday service and sometimes only 70 get out. T-Third Street service is scheduled with the expectation we can get 112 out weekdays.

These are the issues she should be discussing because it's easy to demand improvements that have already been funded.

Hi KWillets,

There definitely needs to be a dedicated place where kids can ride bikes safely and one of the ideas rejected by the activists outright was to close off a different section of the park on saturday. I think even better would be to create some dedicated bike paths separated from traffic, but not cut off from the nearby attractions of the park.

Anyway, why I'm responding is because just yesterday I posted a length piece I'd written about discouraging car use (a step to closure) in Golden Gate Park.

Small correction for Rut, Golden Gate Park is open every day of the week. Sundays is a special case where a small percentage of the park is dedicated to recreational use that normally is used for car traffic and parking. Golden Gate Parking sounds like a downtown garage to me. Golden Gate Park sounds like a place for people to play and relax.

As for being in touch with the voters, I'm glad you bring it up again. Have you looked at the Deleon Progressive Voter index and analysis of Dufty's votes as a Supervisor? Here's the link again. Now you can clearly see that Dufty is way, way, way out of touch with the voters of District 8.

Allow me to quote from that analysis on specific issues supported by D8 voters that Supervisor Dufty did not support...

In particular, three of these issues stand out because Dufty was in clear opposition to District 8 voters presented with these issues.

First, when the Board of Supervisors voted on the “Residential Housing Purchaser Protection Ordinance” Dufty opposed the legislation. Similar legislation was presented to voters as Prop B on the June 2006 ballot. Voters in District 8 came out in support of the ballot measure.

Second, Saturday park closure in Golden Gate Park was presented to San Francisco voters in 2002 as two measures, Prop F and Prop J. Despite the confusion created by the two competing measures, District 8 voters supported Saturday park closure. Polls taken during 2002 and later in 2006 both concluded voters in District 8 are clearly behind Saturday park closure. However, in May 2006 Supervisor Dufty voted against a six-month trial closure of Golden Gate Park on Saturdays, and he later sustained the mayor’s veto on this issue.

Third, Supervisor Dufty failed to sponsor the homicide prevention plan which appeared as Prop A on the June 2006 ballot. District 8 supported Prop A at the ballot.

These key issues show where Supervisor Dufty acted in direct opposition to District 8 voters. Not abstract measures of political leaning, but specific issues that mattered to voters in District 8.

Rut wrote "the park is already closed on sundays so why is the entire weekend necessary? maybe we need to put the vote to the people! oh yeah, the people already voted down the idea back in 2000. maybe bevan is actually in touch with the voters."

I am very active in 3 different clubs and I sat in one candidate interview day and bevan knows the area and he lives in the area as does Alix .. Alix said she doesnt ride muni but she wants to fix it (you cant bitch about muni if you dont ride it).. Also look at the answer to this question "Favorite mode of transportation/favorite MUNI line: My favorite modes of transportation are my scooter, my bicycle, and BART." Why should I vote for someone who is not going to ride MUNI and as stated above MUNI has low floor buses for senior citizens and the disabled. Alix also admitted she doesnt know the area (wouldnt you like your district supervisor to know the exact cross-street your having the issue with) .. And if she doesnt know the are well then why should I vote for her ? I am out every weekend stumping for Bevan because he is the candidate who knows district 8 and when no one would listen that there was an error on the back of my insurance card. He helped me get my voice heard. (would you like to be reffered to a porn number everytime you dialed an 800 number on the back of your medi-cal card?, which is supposed to be a 1-888 number)

Lighting a lighter for Jamison because his in depth knowledge rocks!

Heck, he sure knows more than Alix does! She doesn't even ride Muni! And I'm sure she'd never even be seen dead on the N Judah since it takes you past her office and to the uncool parts of town!

Bevan has my vote, he has character that Rosenthal could never hope to have.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About SFist

SFist is a website about San Francisco.

Editor: Brock Keeling
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

i 'm new to sfist.com I was amazed at SFMOMA Avedon photo exhibit. i've done some research and writt
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from SFist.

All Our RSS