<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SFist: It&apos;s Wednesday.  Do You Know What Your Baseball Stadium is Named Today?</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php</link>
<description>All comments for It&apos;s Wednesday.  Do You Know What Your Baseball Stadium is Named Today?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 SFist_Brock</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brochtrup@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brochtrup@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Jon</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232618</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232618</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that if you&apos;re going to sell you&apos;re naming rights, you should at least make an effort to have it sound cool.  Monster Park does have a nice ring to it (although we were rooting for Virgin to win)and Verizon or Cingular does sound better than say, ABC&amp;S&amp;T Park, or even Minute Made Field.  Iyick.

Another funny thing about naming rights, though- they always go wrong&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>fling93</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232616</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232616</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:47:36 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Weren&apos;t Verizon and Cingular also combos of baby-bells with acronyms for names? Dunno if I&apos;d like those names for parks, though.

Maybe we should just consider ourselves lucky to have even had &quot;Pac Bell Park&quot; for a name, if even for a short while. And SBC Park isn&apos;t as bad a name as frickin&apos; Minute Maid Park (still an improvement over Enron, though).

But I think the root problem of all this (and many other issues) is that there&apos;s way too much money going into sports.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>John</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232615</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232615</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:25:46 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The replacement freeway exit signs for Candlestick/3COM went up recently - heading home on 101N from my office the signs now read &quot;Monster Park&quot; which sounds better than 3COM to me at least. 

I think that the trick to these things is to use a word rather than an acronym. Unless SBC feels like a total rebranding is in order as a result of this acquisition, it seems unlikely that the combo of two companies with acronyms for names will result in anything but another acronym though.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>fling93</title>
<link>http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232606</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sfist.com/2005/02/02/its_wednesday_do_you_know_what_your_baseball_stadium_is_named_today.php#comment-232606</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:44:57 -0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm. TypeKey validation failed, for some reason.

Anyway, I expect my approach will be the same as it was for Candlestick. When they changed the name to 3COM Park, I just called it &quot;The Park Formerly Known as Candlestick.&quot;

Seems kinda unwieldy, but I&apos;m not the kind of person who sez very much, so it&apos;s generally not an issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
